Connecting rods

Topics Last Day Last Week Tree View    Getting Started Formatting Troubleshooting Program Credits    New Messages Keyword Search Contact Moderators Edit Profile Administration
Model T Ford Forum: Forum 2010: Connecting rods
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message  By Rob from Nova Scotia on Sunday, September 12, 2010 - 08:11 pm:

what is the difference between a light rod and a, well, heavy one. I am sending away a set for exchange, and want to make sure I send the correct ones


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message  By jack daron-Indy. on Sunday, September 12, 2010 - 08:57 pm:

Heavy rods are much fatter along the beam,and heavier.


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message  By Rob from Nova Scotia on Sunday, September 12, 2010 - 09:08 pm:

Thanks Jack. Ill check to see if I have two different sizes in my parts stash. Do they have a different part number, just in case I have all heavy ones? What years were they produced, etc?


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message  By Rick Metott, Sandy Creek, NY on Sunday, September 12, 2010 - 09:48 pm:

If you have the Macs 2010-11 catalog the have a picture on pg 31. The light (acceptable) rod is 5/8" wide on the piston end & 3/4" on the other. The heavy (unacceptable) is 3/4" & 1".

I tired to find it on their website, but didn't have any luck.


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message  By kep (hiding in NZ) on Monday, September 13, 2010 - 04:41 am:

What is acceptable or not acceptable about the 'rods?


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message  By Roger K, southern Sweden on Monday, September 13, 2010 - 04:56 am:

Kep, it's about what's acceptable to send in exchange as a core to the rebabbitters. If you have an early engine and want it really authentic, I guess it's possible to get the heavy ones rebabbitted too, from other sources (but probably at a higher price)

Almost noone wants to use the heavy rods though, since the lighter ones are plentiful & strong enough for the job - and they give less of a strain on the bearings and the crank shaft.


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message  By Seth Harbuck - Shreveport, LA on Monday, September 13, 2010 - 05:00 am:

The vendors will not accept the heavy rods as cores when you buy rebabitted rods from them. That shouldn't be any problem for you in New Zealand if you buy from a vendor in the US because the shipping cost to return the cores to get your $10 for each rod would probably be prohibitive.


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message  By John Faccin - Crystal Falls, Michigan on Monday, September 13, 2010 - 05:01 am:

Kep,

The light ones are the most desireable and what you are getting from a vendor who sells rebuilt rods exchange. The heavy rods are not desireable because of more rotating mass in the engine. Therefore light acceptable and heavy not acceptable.


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message  By Seth Harbuck - Shreveport, LA on Monday, September 13, 2010 - 05:05 am:

LOL! I suppose if you really wanted your early engine authentic, you'd also use cast iron pistons, and if so, the heavy rods certainly aren't going to add much more weight.


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message  By Richard Gould on Monday, September 13, 2010 - 10:16 am:

Did anyone see what the final eBay bid price was on the star rods a while back?


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message  By Rob from Nova Scotia on Monday, September 13, 2010 - 10:18 am:

At what point did Ford stop using the heavy rods?


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message  By Seth Harbuck - Shreveport, LA on Monday, September 13, 2010 - 10:32 am:

According to the MTFCA Encyclopedia, under "E" (engines) the new lightweight rod with 1/16" thick babbitt was introduced in the 1920 model year.

So if that coincides with about unit #4,000,000 and they made 15 million cars, they made some 44 million light connecting rods for production. Even more if you add service parts.


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message  By Roger K, southern Sweden on Monday, September 13, 2010 - 10:47 am:

Richard, was it the 1927 X-rods with tin pistons you were thinking of? http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=110576940765
They went for $420.. Rare stuff. I wonder for how long these parts were used in spare engine production after '27?

http://www.mtfca.com/encyclo/E.htm#eng2
All heavy rods isn't the same - Ford made the connecting rods lighter for the 1915 model year too, but the're still considered heavy rods. Rare early 1909 heavy rods with integrated oil dipper would probably fetch high prices just like the X/star rods.


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message  By Norman T. Kling on Monday, September 13, 2010 - 12:42 pm:

When I took apart the 22, I found 3 different type rods in it! It will run with a combination, but it is not properly balanced that way. It now has all light weight rods.
Norm


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message  By CharlieB-Toms River N.J. on Monday, September 13, 2010 - 01:14 pm:

Sounds like Tom Joad from the Grapes of Wrath worked on your car Norman. They blew a rod on the way to Californ-i-a and he goes to a junkyard,finds a rod the looks OK, fits it and their on the road again. Off to further disasters. Then again I'm not sure if it was a T.


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message  By Wayne Sheldon, Grass Valley, CA on Monday, September 13, 2010 - 01:31 pm:

I have pulled apart a couple of engines with a mix of light and heavy rods. The most recent was one reworked by a fellow who had a business working on model Ts and was claimed to be a professional. He said he had used this engine in his T for awhile when rebuilding the original one. I refitted a light rod from my stock in its place. I wonder how many old engines are out there with a mix of light and heavy rods.
Drive safely, W2


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message  By kep (hiding in NZ) on Monday, September 13, 2010 - 02:28 pm:

i might end up with a mixture of light and heavy 'rods as i cannot find a matching set. i weighed them and there is something like 140 grams difference but the 2 "matching" 'rods have alot of difference too


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message  By Seth Harbuck - Shreveport, LA on Monday, September 13, 2010 - 02:34 pm:

But nowhere near any 140 grams - that's over 1/3 of a pound!


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message  By CoreyWalker, Brownsboro, Texas on Monday, September 13, 2010 - 07:13 pm:

I think Tom Joad drove a Hudson. Sure it had babbitt rods, my 47 Hudson has them. My 21 engine had 2 front main caps instead of a center main cap.


Add a Message


This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Username:  
Password:

Topics Last Day Last Week Tree View    Getting Started Formatting Troubleshooting Program Credits    New Messages Keyword Search Contact Moderators Edit Profile Administration