OFF TOPIC, but Ford anyway

Topics Last Day Last Week Tree View    Getting Started Formatting Troubleshooting Program Credits    New Messages Keyword Search Contact Moderators Edit Profile Administration
Model T Ford Forum: Forum 2005: OFF TOPIC, but Ford anyway
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message  By Charlie Tosch on Friday, April 13, 2007 - 11:52 pm:

Back in the early 1960's I was an engineering student at Stevens Institute of Technology in Hoboken, NJ. Sometime about 1961 or 1962 the Ford Motor Company arrived on campus with an enclosed semi-trailer containing a prototype Mustang for us students to view and drool over. It was nothing like the production Mustang as you can see from the scans of the brochure that Ford handed out. Check it out. The engine was a 91.4 cu. in. V-4 located just forward of the rear axle. Among other features it had non-adjustable seats that were an integral part of the body. The pedal assembly was adjustable for and aft a distance of 4 inches to accomodate diferent sized drivers. The steering column was also adjustable for and aft for a distance of 3 inches. The concealed headlamps were another innovation in the Mustang.

Here is what the brochure we received looks like:

a

b

c

d

e

f

g

h

Charlie Tosch


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message  By Royce on Saturday, April 14, 2007 - 12:10 am:

That car, the Mustang I prototype, was built to test public reaction to see if a two seat sports car with a peppy small engine was going to be a hit with the public. They also built a second concept, the Mustang II based on the Falcon.


You know the rest of the story, the public went crazy over the Mustang they built which was based on the competing concept Mustang 4 seater based on the Falcon platform.

Those brochures sell pretty well on Ebay.

Royce


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message  By EDWARD R LEVY on Saturday, April 14, 2007 - 12:49 am:

When I read your post the thing that struck me was the V4 engine. In the 1960's I owned a three cylinder 2 cycle Saab. A very ugly & very well designed pruduct. I remember that the car was also available with a V4 engine & I think itwas supplied by the German division of Ford. My memory is weak on this point. Can anyone verify or clarify this point?
Edfward R. Levy


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message  By David Carter on Saturday, April 14, 2007 - 12:50 am:

MODEL T FORUM


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message  By Doug Money on Saturday, April 14, 2007 - 01:22 am:

That sure looks an awful lot like the Mach 5. I had never seen thes brochures before.


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message  By keith barrier on Saturday, April 14, 2007 - 04:37 am:

Edward, you are right I owned a 1969 95 wagon with the v4 and freewheeling overdrive, very ugly but dependable. Engine looked like a mini 289 keith b


Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.
Topics Last Day Last Week Tree View    Getting Started Formatting Troubleshooting Program Credits    New Messages Keyword Search Contact Moderators Edit Profile Administration