Mill the Z-Head for higher C.R.?
Forum rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules
-
Topic author - Posts: 224
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 10:01 pm
- First Name: Chris
- Last Name: Bamford
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1924 Speedster 1926 Touring
- Location: Edmonton AB Canada
- MTFCA Number: 17817
Mill the Z-Head for higher C.R.?
I would like to hear others' experience with and/or opinions around milling an aluminum Z-head to increase compression.
By my estimation, there is currently some 0.150" space between the pistons and the cylinder head "horseshoe" squish area. This is including the head gasket (photos below)
There looks to be ample meat in the head casting to mill, say 0.050 — 0.075 off the head.
The engine is a 1924 block with aluminum pistons, SBC valves, Stipe 280 cam, Simmons SuperPower carb and enhanced splash oiling, coupled to a period cast-iron Warford, in a medium-weight speedster.
By my estimation, there is currently some 0.150" space between the pistons and the cylinder head "horseshoe" squish area. This is including the head gasket (photos below)
There looks to be ample meat in the head casting to mill, say 0.050 — 0.075 off the head.
The engine is a 1924 block with aluminum pistons, SBC valves, Stipe 280 cam, Simmons SuperPower carb and enhanced splash oiling, coupled to a period cast-iron Warford, in a medium-weight speedster.
-
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2019 11:18 pm
- First Name: Terry
- Last Name: Loftus
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 26 Speedster
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
- MTFCA Number: 7379
- MTFCA Life Member: YES
Re: Mill the Z-Head for higher C.R.?
Most times less is more.
15 years ago on my first and current T speedster engine I milled the stock head 0.100. It did not improve performance noticeably if any.
A year later I put a 7:1 Lizard head on because of the advertised and perceived better performance. This was supposed to be because of higher compression and supposedly better spark plug location. Was it really the best head for the application? In hindsight, my opinion is, NO. Did it provide better performance than a stock or milled stock head, yes. Did it cause other problems, maybe.
I then put on an out of the box 6:1 Z head on after that and have been running it for over 12 years. I feel this is the best performing head I have used. I feel that they knew what they were doing when they designed this head. And I mean both compression ratio, combustion chamber design, and other factors.
Please remember less is more.
Terry
15 years ago on my first and current T speedster engine I milled the stock head 0.100. It did not improve performance noticeably if any.
A year later I put a 7:1 Lizard head on because of the advertised and perceived better performance. This was supposed to be because of higher compression and supposedly better spark plug location. Was it really the best head for the application? In hindsight, my opinion is, NO. Did it provide better performance than a stock or milled stock head, yes. Did it cause other problems, maybe.
I then put on an out of the box 6:1 Z head on after that and have been running it for over 12 years. I feel this is the best performing head I have used. I feel that they knew what they were doing when they designed this head. And I mean both compression ratio, combustion chamber design, and other factors.
Please remember less is more.
Terry
-
- Posts: 3299
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:56 am
- First Name: Dan
- Last Name: Treace
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: '23 cutoff, '25 touring, '27 touring
- Location: North Central FL
- MTFCA Number: 4838
- MTFCI Number: 115
- Board Member Since: 2000
- Contact:
Re: Mill the Z-Head for higher C.R.?
My experience with Z head was some of the pistons caused interference, needed to grind away some alum at the lip inside the Z head. The Z combustion chamber is ‘as cast’, and each chamber is slightly different. Shaving the head may cause issues.
Changed out the Z and installed a Prus head, really significant change in performance and smoother running. The Prus head has CNC machined combustion chambers, all are identical. My preferred hi—compression head now.
Changed out the Z and installed a Prus head, really significant change in performance and smoother running. The Prus head has CNC machined combustion chambers, all are identical. My preferred hi—compression head now.
The best way is always the simplest. The attics of the world are cluttered up with complicated failures. Henry Ford
Don’t find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain. Henry Ford
Don’t find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain. Henry Ford
-
- Posts: 1922
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:23 am
- First Name: Rich
- Last Name: Bingham
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1913 runabout
- Location: Blackfoot, Idaho
Re: Mill the Z-Head for higher C.R.?
Just “academically”, how much of an increase does that .050-.075” make in the compression ratio ?
"Get a horse !"
-
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 2:36 pm
- First Name: Dennis
- Last Name: Prince
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1)24 touring 2)25 TT's 1)26 roadster 2)26 tourings 1) 26coupe 1)27 funster 1)28 A pick up
- Location: Madras Oregon
- MTFCA Number: 22802
- Board Member Since: 1999
Re: Mill the Z-Head for higher C.R.?
I had to mill .034 off of my Z head to make it flat and it caused no problems and it didn't seem to change performance any. If you mill it now and need to later you may be out of luck, I would say leave it alone.
-
Topic author - Posts: 224
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 10:01 pm
- First Name: Chris
- Last Name: Bamford
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1924 Speedster 1926 Touring
- Location: Edmonton AB Canada
- MTFCA Number: 17817
Re: Mill the Z-Head for higher C.R.?
Thanks to all who replied, although I was expecting a livelier discussion.
With the number of Z-heads in service and the general interest by so many T'ers in improved performance, I'm surprised more folks have not chimed in with direct personal experience.
Seems to me if the bottom end is in good shape and any clearance issues resolved, that 0.060 to 0.070 off the head can only improve power output. Even with a head shave the compression ratio would still be lower than the Plus head, which is used frequently with, AFAIK, no bearing longevity issues.
With the number of Z-heads in service and the general interest by so many T'ers in improved performance, I'm surprised more folks have not chimed in with direct personal experience.
Seems to me if the bottom end is in good shape and any clearance issues resolved, that 0.060 to 0.070 off the head can only improve power output. Even with a head shave the compression ratio would still be lower than the Plus head, which is used frequently with, AFAIK, no bearing longevity issues.
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Sat Feb 29, 2020 1:26 pm
- First Name: Larry
- Last Name: Young
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: '26 Tudor, '22 speedster, ABC/Rajo
- Location: Tulsa
Re: Mill the Z-Head for higher C.R.?
As has been noted, milling of a head with a Ricardo-squish type combustion chamber is limited by clearance over the piston. The book "Souping the Stock Engine" says better performance is achieved if the clearance does not exceed 0.090". It needs to be at least 0.040". You can easily calculated the CR change due to milling. I put some examples up at the Tulsa website years ago - http://mtfctulsa.com/Tech/head_design.htm. Milling a Z head 0.050 increased the CR from 5.3 to 5.7. The stock combustion chamber is so cavernous that milling even 0.125 increases the CR from 3.8 to only 4.2, but you still have a very poor combustion chamber design. You could fly cut the squish area above the piston, but if you go too far, the bottom deck will be too thin. The other idea is a custom popup piston, as has been mentioned. Why doesn't someone offer a true 6:1 head? Instead we have all the false advertising about 8:1 heads. - Larry Young
-
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 2:55 pm
- First Name: Pat
- Last Name: Kelly
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 23 Speedster, 25 TT, 26 Roadster, 27 Tudor
- Location: Noxon MT
Re: Mill the Z-Head for higher C.R.?
Several makes of heads that have different combustion chambers and claim high compression. A Waukesha Recardo, Sherman and a Prus.The Prus is on the right in the combustion chamber comparison photo. As you can see the Sherman has very high compression. I was told not to run it on a stock lower.
-
- Posts: 979
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 5:42 pm
- First Name: Stan
- Last Name: Howe
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 2
- Location: Helena, MT
- MTFCA Number: 19133
- Board Member Since: 1999
Re: Mill the Z-Head for higher C.R.?
We named those Lizard heads Yapp Crapp for a reason. I cut mine in half with my chop saw and threw it on the iron pile so it would get hauled in for scrap instead of causing problems for somebody else.
IMHO or NSHO the Prus Iron head is the best of the new heads. The PRUS Aluminum head is next. Of the old ones, the Haibe Highpower - which is the same as the Giant Highpower - is the best of all. I've had a couple Waukasha heads, virtually every one I've ever found on an original engine since I started looking for them in the 50's came off a Baldwin combine power engine. I wasn't much impressed with the ones I ran.
Wanna go Zoom?? Haibe or Prus. Z - not bad
IMHO or NSHO the Prus Iron head is the best of the new heads. The PRUS Aluminum head is next. Of the old ones, the Haibe Highpower - which is the same as the Giant Highpower - is the best of all. I've had a couple Waukasha heads, virtually every one I've ever found on an original engine since I started looking for them in the 50's came off a Baldwin combine power engine. I wasn't much impressed with the ones I ran.
Wanna go Zoom?? Haibe or Prus. Z - not bad
-
Topic author - Posts: 224
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 10:01 pm
- First Name: Chris
- Last Name: Bamford
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1924 Speedster 1926 Touring
- Location: Edmonton AB Canada
- MTFCA Number: 17817
Re: Mill the Z-Head for higher C.R.?
Thank you gentlemen. That’s the sort of lively and helpful discussion I was hoping for.
-
- Posts: 1049
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 10:53 am
- First Name: Terry
- Last Name: Woods
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1927 Model T coupe, 1926 4 door sedan
- Location: Cibolo (San Antonio), TX
- MTFCI Number: 20180
Re: Mill the Z-Head for higher C.R.?
If you check the Tulsa MTFCA club's site, they have a entire section dedicated to cylinder heads and testing. I think they tested a 'stock' Z head and one milled .050.
-
Topic author - Posts: 224
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 10:01 pm
- First Name: Chris
- Last Name: Bamford
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1924 Speedster 1926 Touring
- Location: Edmonton AB Canada
- MTFCA Number: 17817
Re: Mill the Z-Head for higher C.R.?
Thanks Terry, that's very helpful.
Further up the same page the author states the preferred clearance above the piston is 0.050-0.080". What I have now is double or more this ideal.
https://mtfctulsa.com/Tech/head_design.htm
Further up the same page the author states the preferred clearance above the piston is 0.050-0.080". What I have now is double or more this ideal.
https://mtfctulsa.com/Tech/head_design.htm
-
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2020 10:04 pm
- First Name: Cory
- Last Name: Woerth
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 26 engine on a stand, Canadian '23 center door
- Location: Colorado Springs CO
- Board Member Since: 2020
Re: Mill the Z-Head for higher C.R.?
for the fun of it :
if you added material instead of milling, you would need a theoretical "disc" of metal 3.75" diameter by .130" thick to bring the compression ratio from 5.3 to 1, to 6.0 to 1.
if you added material instead of milling, you would need a theoretical "disc" of metal 3.75" diameter by .130" thick to bring the compression ratio from 5.3 to 1, to 6.0 to 1.