Relpacing pan ears.
Posted: Sun May 24, 2020 2:08 am
Recently two long nosed pans were offered on the classifieds forum. One of these had had an ear replaced. Both looked to be good examples.
However, there are things to be considered when replacing a damaged pan ear, as there are differences to be noted. Swapping a pan ear from similar pans is fine, but mixing parts from different years presents problems which are not often recognised.
Fitting an ear with the squared off end from a late pan is not a good idea on a long nosed pan. Clearly it does not even look right. So, selecting an ear from an earlier pan with the pointed end is preferable. But how it is fitted becomes really important. From around 1918, engine pan rails were reinforced by stamping a flange along the outside of the mounting face to stiffen up the pan rail. This means that where the ear mounts to the pan, it has to accommodate that flange, and so the length of the ear is longer to allow it to mount at the frame in the same relative position.
Using such an ear as a replacement on a flat rail pan like the long nosed ones, requires that the ear be mounted in such a way that it would clear the flange if in fact it was one there. If it is fitted up tight to the pan rail, it will be higher than the ear on the other side, resulting in the motor hanging lower in the frame on that side.
Hope this helps someone facing this scenario.
Allan from down under.
However, there are things to be considered when replacing a damaged pan ear, as there are differences to be noted. Swapping a pan ear from similar pans is fine, but mixing parts from different years presents problems which are not often recognised.
Fitting an ear with the squared off end from a late pan is not a good idea on a long nosed pan. Clearly it does not even look right. So, selecting an ear from an earlier pan with the pointed end is preferable. But how it is fitted becomes really important. From around 1918, engine pan rails were reinforced by stamping a flange along the outside of the mounting face to stiffen up the pan rail. This means that where the ear mounts to the pan, it has to accommodate that flange, and so the length of the ear is longer to allow it to mount at the frame in the same relative position.
Using such an ear as a replacement on a flat rail pan like the long nosed ones, requires that the ear be mounted in such a way that it would clear the flange if in fact it was one there. If it is fitted up tight to the pan rail, it will be higher than the ear on the other side, resulting in the motor hanging lower in the frame on that side.
Hope this helps someone facing this scenario.
Allan from down under.