Has anyone heard of a “Jumbo” brand two-speed rear end?

Discuss all things Model T related.
Forum rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules

Topic author
NorthSouth
Posts: 512
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 9:18 pm
First Name: Steve
Last Name: California
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1911 Touring, 1912 Warren Speedster
Location: West Coast
MTFCA Number: 50392

Has anyone heard of a “Jumbo” brand two-speed rear end?

Post by NorthSouth » Mon Jul 19, 2021 3:12 pm

-
Hello fellow Model T-ers,

Have any of you heard of a “Jumbo” brand two-speed rear end? Here is a photograph, the best I could find, of one on a 1910 model T Ford. I would be interested in whether they work similar to a Ruckstell, whether or not they are problematic, and any other information about them.

Thank you in advance for guidance you might give me on this question.
Attachments
A7A64180-680B-4308-98FA-131A95084B7F.jpeg
A7A64180-680B-4308-98FA-131A95084B7F.jpeg (9.75 KiB) Viewed 2065 times


Dan McEachern
Posts: 1191
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:08 am
First Name: DAN
Last Name: MCEACHERN
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: too many. '14 touring, 2 depot hacks, 2 speedsters
Location: ALAMEDA,CA,USA

Re: Has anyone heard of a “Jumbo” brand two-speed rear end?

Post by Dan McEachern » Mon Jul 19, 2021 3:59 pm

need a better picture- looks like it may be a driveline trans of some sort, but...…………….


Scott_Conger
Posts: 6435
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:18 am
First Name: Scott
Last Name: Conger
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: '13, '15, '19, '23
Location: Clark, WY
Board Member Since: 2005

Re: Has anyone heard of a “Jumbo” brand two-speed rear end?

Post by Scott_Conger » Mon Jul 19, 2021 4:02 pm

Scott Conger

Tyranny under the guise of law is still Tyranny

NH Full Flow Float Valves
Obsolete carburetor parts manufactured


Wayne Sheldon
Posts: 3678
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 3:13 pm
First Name: Wayne
Last Name: Sheldon
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1915 Runabout 1913 Speedster
Location: Grass Valley California, USA
Board Member Since: 2005

Re: Has anyone heard of a “Jumbo” brand two-speed rear end?

Post by Wayne Sheldon » Mon Jul 19, 2021 4:18 pm

Just a quick clarification. The photo offered may be of a "1910" car, maybe a wannabe 1910? But the rear end appears to be later 1910s. The Planator underdrives (either Starr or Jumbo) are a 1920s era accessory.


Norman Kling
Posts: 4097
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 1:39 pm
First Name: Norman
Last Name: Kling
Location: Alpine California

Re: Has anyone heard of a “Jumbo” brand two-speed rear end?

Post by Norman Kling » Mon Jul 19, 2021 4:29 pm

It might work fine, but since it has a modification of the driveshaft and driveshaft tube, and is not as common as the Ruckstell, I would recommend the owner keep a stock rear end complete with the driveshaft just in case the Planator breaks down, they can still use the car with a simple transfer of the rear axle assembly.
Norm

User avatar

kelly mt
Posts: 250
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 2:55 pm
First Name: Pat
Last Name: Kelly
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 23 Speedster, 25 TT, 26 Roadster, 27 Tudor
Location: Noxon MT

Re: Has anyone heard of a “Jumbo” brand two-speed rear end?

Post by kelly mt » Mon Jul 19, 2021 8:33 pm

Planators, I think that's what you have there, can get into a neutral condition. You will want outside auxiliary brakes if you run one. I think they have a 50% reduction.


100_6259.JPG


Southfork Creek
Posts: 172
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2019 9:13 am
First Name: John
Last Name: Wightman
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1915 Touring
Location: Phoenix AZ
Board Member Since: 2005

Re: Has anyone heard of a “Jumbo” brand two-speed rear end?

Post by Southfork Creek » Mon Jul 19, 2021 8:45 pm

I had one in a 1915 that was on a Southern Wide Track chassis. I figured (guessed) it was originally used on real muddy roads, or some other low speed function. So, for me, it was pretty much useless for traveling on paved roads as all I needed was the High and Low pedal. Just extra weight for not much practical purpose.

User avatar

Steve Jelf
Posts: 6496
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 9:37 pm
First Name: Steve
Last Name: Jelf
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1923 touring and a few projects
Location: Parkerfield, Kansas
MTFCA Number: 16175
MTFCI Number: 14758
Board Member Since: 2007
Contact:

Re: Has anyone heard of a “Jumbo” brand two-speed rear end?

Post by Steve Jelf » Mon Jul 19, 2021 9:30 pm

The 50% reduction is the same as a Ruckstell. I believe the advantage is low gearing in high for climbing and descending grades without having to resort to the tiresome low pedal. Not very important in the relatively flat middle of the country, but quite desirable in places like Pennsylvania and the western states, both of which have long, steep grades.
The inevitable often happens.
1915 Runabout
1923 Touring


Dropacent
Posts: 3384
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:39 am
First Name: Tim
Last Name: Morsher
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1925TT, 1926 Martin-Parry bodied wagon, 1927 mercury bodied speedster
Location: Norwalk Ohio

Re: Has anyone heard of a “Jumbo” brand two-speed rear end?

Post by Dropacent » Mon Jul 19, 2021 9:41 pm

The Jumbo planatar can’t get into neutral unless there is something seriously broken. They fixed flaws from the earlier Starr Planatar design to take care of that. If either one’s inside condition is unknown, it is always smart to have another source of brakes.


Wayne Sheldon
Posts: 3678
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 3:13 pm
First Name: Wayne
Last Name: Sheldon
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1915 Runabout 1913 Speedster
Location: Grass Valley California, USA
Board Member Since: 2005

Re: Has anyone heard of a “Jumbo” brand two-speed rear end?

Post by Wayne Sheldon » Mon Jul 19, 2021 11:17 pm

The Planator, along with Moore and the Universal (brand name!) are desirable in the brass era crowd because they can be used on an early 'clamshell' rear end which the Ruckstell cannot be used on. They cannot be used on the earliest clamshell rear ends used in the first year of manufacturing due to the Babbitt pinion bearing and special torque tube. They give most of the useful advantages of a Ruckstell without having to giv up the desirable early rear axle.
The Ruckstell axle can be used on the 1913'/14 (which actually came out late in the 1912) rear end and everything later.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic