Thoughts on two subjects, cylinders with .080" bore, crank with counter weights

Discuss all things Model T related.
Forum rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules

Topic author
RGould1910
Posts: 988
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2019 8:16 am
First Name: Richard
Last Name: Gould
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1910 touring, 1912 roadster , 1927 roadster
Location: Folsom, CA

Thoughts on two subjects, cylinders with .080" bore, crank with counter weights

Post by RGould1910 » Sun Mar 17, 2019 2:29 pm

I'd appreciate thoughts on two subjects. I am restoring a 27 engine that sat for a lot of years. It was restored about 40 years ago and driven sparingly for about 10 years. My issues are the benefits and detriments of two items I found on disassembly. The crank has counter weights bolted on. It appears they have been drilled for balance. So has the flywheel. Don't know whether they were static or spin balanced. Also the cylinders have been bored .080".
I'd like to hear thoughts from those who have run counter weights,and those who have bored blocks .080" OS, pro and con. Thanks in advance for any input.


Topic author
RGould1910
Posts: 988
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2019 8:16 am
First Name: Richard
Last Name: Gould
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1910 touring, 1912 roadster , 1927 roadster
Location: Folsom, CA

Re: Thoughts on two subjects, cylinders with .080" bore, crank with counter weights

Post by RGould1910 » Sun Mar 17, 2019 2:36 pm

Forgot to add the crank has been turned .025" under. Rods are .020" under.


Nv Bob
Posts: 782
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:04 pm
First Name: Bob
Last Name: Middleton
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 18 roadster 1810 brand X
Location: Western nv

Re: Thoughts on two subjects, cylinders with .080" bore, crank with counter weights

Post by Nv Bob » Sun Mar 17, 2019 2:47 pm

Richard long time my friend
I seen bolted counter weights come loose not pretty but when working they do make for a smoother engine
.080 bore can be had but if the holes are that big time to think to sleeve them. Yes you can get away with if

User avatar

Henry K. Lee
Posts: 5339
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:09 am
First Name: Henry
Last Name: Lee
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: Many
Location: South Pittsburg, TN
MTFCA Number: 479
MTFCA Life Member: YES

Re: Thoughts on two subjects, cylinders with .080" bore, crank with counter weights

Post by Henry K. Lee » Sun Mar 17, 2019 3:13 pm

Richard,

Those style like the Dunn ones are very good but the real secret is tack welding the end of the threads pass the nuts. The use of a nickel alloy rod to attach them slightly to the crankshaft is an added bonus. Been doing it for about 20 years with no issues. Just me.

Hope this Helps,

Hank


Les Schubert
Posts: 1319
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2019 5:47 pm
First Name: Les
Last Name: Schubert
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 27 roadster 13 touring
Location: Calgary

Re: Thoughts on two subjects, cylinders with .080" bore, crank with counter weights

Post by Les Schubert » Sun Mar 17, 2019 3:55 pm

I have had the bolt on Dunn weights on my 27 roadster since 1979 and many thousands of miles. If these are still hanging in there, I would not be too concerned. The weld spot is probably OK. I would carefully loosen the bolts one at a time, being careful not to disturb the fit up, and put some Loktite on the threads and retorque to the way they are. Yours might have cotter pins and if so, don’t touch it!!!!
If it was my engine and I had it apart I would get the crank and flywheel dynamically balanced while it is convenient.
The.080 wouldn’t bother me if there is no sign of coolant “weepage “
Best of luck

User avatar

henryford2
Posts: 796
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 4:14 pm
First Name: Joseph
Last Name: Andulics
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926 Fordor, 1926 Truck, 1927 Roadster GOW, RAJO Sprint car
Location: North Ridgeville, OH
MTFCA Number: 9766
Contact:

Re: Thoughts on two subjects, cylinders with .080" bore, crank with counter weights

Post by henryford2 » Sun Mar 17, 2019 8:52 pm

Just an FYI my experience with the "new aftermarket bolt on counterweights especially on the 26/27 crank was they had to be "fitted" to the crank, otherwise they will put a "bend" in the crankshaft. Used grade 8 bolts, locking nuts and thread locker. Ultimately decided against using them.


Les Schubert
Posts: 1319
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2019 5:47 pm
First Name: Les
Last Name: Schubert
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 27 roadster 13 touring
Location: Calgary

Re: Thoughts on two subjects, cylinders with .080" bore, crank with counter weights

Post by Les Schubert » Sun Mar 17, 2019 11:15 pm

A few more thoughts;
1. Check the crank for deflection at the centre main bearing. Remove the centre main cap and check for wear in this bearing. Some wear in the centre main is not unusual. Now take a dial indicator and have it run on the centre main as you turn the crank. I would hope for very little runout. Perhaps.002-.003 max. A poor installation of the bolt on weights will cause significant bend in the crank. I have witnessed it!!
2. .080” over bore. As long as there is no evidence of coolant leakage into the cylinder bores, then I would have no concern.
IF there was evidence of leakage then a sleeve job and smaller pistons is a perfectly reasonable solution. I have sleeved T blocks back to standard several times


Topic author
RGould1910
Posts: 988
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2019 8:16 am
First Name: Richard
Last Name: Gould
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1910 touring, 1912 roadster , 1927 roadster
Location: Folsom, CA

Re: Thoughts on two subjects, cylinders with .080" bore, crank with counter weights

Post by RGould1910 » Mon Mar 18, 2019 10:20 am

Thanks to all responders for all the helpful suggestions. I don' know where else you can get all this collective input. :) :)


Joe Bell
Posts: 1057
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2019 1:20 pm
First Name: Joe
Last Name: Bell
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 24 Fordor
Location: Tiffin Ohio
MTFCI Number: 24066

Re: Thoughts on two subjects, cylinders with .080" bore, crank with counter weights

Post by Joe Bell » Mon Mar 18, 2019 11:18 am

Richard, I had two engines done by some one else that came in with a bad mid range vibration, after opening them up both had the counter weights attached. They had been balanced with the weights to the crank and spot welded to the crank. I sent them out for Dynamic balancing reinstalled the crank fired it up and the vibration was still there?? I do not know if the weights where original early style or later repops? I removed the weights and rebalanced and the vibration was gone?? The owner was happier than a pig in slop after it was redone this way. This was my first issue with them attached like this and since then I really do not care for them. Just what I had found on a couple engines, hope this helps.
Thanks Joe


Joe Bell
Posts: 1057
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2019 1:20 pm
First Name: Joe
Last Name: Bell
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 24 Fordor
Location: Tiffin Ohio
MTFCI Number: 24066

Re: Thoughts on two subjects, cylinders with .080" bore, crank with counter weights

Post by Joe Bell » Mon Mar 18, 2019 11:18 am

Richard, I had two engines done by some one else that came in with a bad mid range vibration, after opening them up both had the counter weights attached. They had been balanced with the weights to the crank and spot welded to the crank. I sent them out for Dynamic balancing reinstalled the crank fired it up and the vibration was still there?? I do not know if the weights where original early style or later repops? I removed the weights and rebalanced and the vibration was gone?? The owner was happier than a pig in slop after it was redone this way. This was my first issue with them attached like this and since then I really do not care for them. Just what I had found on a couple engines, hope this helps.
Thanks Joe

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic