Parts Books

Discuss all things Model T related.
Forum rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules

Topic author
Original Smith
Posts: 3284
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 10:43 am
First Name: Larry
Last Name: Smith
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 13 Touring, 13 Roadster, 17 Coupelet, 25 Roadster P/U
Location: Lomita, California
MTFCA Number: 121
MTFCA Life Member: YES
MTFCI Number: 16310

Parts Books

Post by Original Smith » Wed May 18, 2022 1:51 pm

I have a good sized collection of original Ford T literature, and have heard for many years, the Ford actually had a listing of Ruckstell parts in his late parts book. I finally saw an example of one of these on the Ford fix website. It is a fake to be sure, probably botched together by Polyprints back in the sixties. They even misspelled AXLE! After 1924, Ford never put a thicker cover on their parts books, they were always the same weight paper used on the rest of the pages in the booklet.

User avatar

Steve Jelf
Posts: 6463
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 9:37 pm
First Name: Steve
Last Name: Jelf
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1923 touring and a few projects
Location: Parkerfield, Kansas
MTFCA Number: 16175
MTFCI Number: 14758
Board Member Since: 2007
Contact:

Re: Parts Books

Post by Steve Jelf » Wed May 18, 2022 2:06 pm

The 8-5-28 parts book available in reprint from all the dealers devotes the last six pages to Ruckstell axles and parts, both passenger car and truck. With a cursory inspection I did not detect any misspellings.
The inevitable often happens.
1915 Runabout
1923 Touring

User avatar

Mark Gregush
Posts: 4957
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2019 1:57 pm
First Name: Mark
Last Name: Gregush
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1925 cutdown PU, 1920 Dodge touring, 1948 F2 Ford flat head 6 pickup 3 speed
Location: Portland Or
MTFCA Number: 52564
Board Member Since: 1999

Re: Parts Books

Post by Mark Gregush » Wed May 18, 2022 2:46 pm

I have a 1921 Wholesale parts list, that as Larry said, the cover stock is same as pages inside and does not show anything that it would be a reproduction. However, my March of 1927 body parts book, which has no indication of being a reprint, does have heavier stock used for cover.
I wonder if the reprints have a heavier cover to protect the pages within, or to mirror the owner's manual?
I know the voices aren't real but damn they have some good ideas! :shock:

1925 Cut down pickup
1920 Dodge touring
1948 Ford F2 pickup

User avatar

DanTreace
Posts: 3299
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:56 am
First Name: Dan
Last Name: Treace
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: '23 cutoff, '25 touring, '27 touring
Location: North Central FL
MTFCA Number: 4838
MTFCI Number: 115
Board Member Since: 2000
Contact:

Re: Parts Books

Post by DanTreace » Thu May 19, 2022 8:35 am

Steve Jelf wrote:
Wed May 18, 2022 2:06 pm
The 8-5-28 parts book available in reprint from all the dealers devotes the last six pages to Ruckstell axles and parts, both passenger car and truck. With a cursory inspection I did not detect any misspellings.

Agree with Original Smith. Ford never sold parts for the Ruckstell in the Ford Price List of Parts books.

That Polyprint reproduction of the Aug. 5 1928 Price List of Parts that has that May 1, 1924 6-page "Ruckstell Axle Parts Price List added, is the current version sold by vendors as T-7. That version is the later one, and the addition of the Ruckstell Price list was done by Polyprint in about 1980 or so. There was never a connection of Ford officially selling parts from the Ford price book for Ruckstell parts. Makes no sense.

I have an earlier copy of T-7 and the last page says the Price List is copied from the Aug 5 1928 Price list and is 55 pages, that earlier Polyprint is true to the Ford price list. This early version reprint is printed on that page T-7 $1.00


A check of other Ford Price List of Parts, the later versions from Ford, May 1929 and March 1930 have no 6 pages of that 1924 Ruckstell price list. Neither do the 1926 and 1927 Ford Wholesale Price List of Parts, that makes sense as Ford couldn't have wholesaled Ruckstell parts they didn't manufacture!


Here is scan of that latest Polyprint T-7 of the Ford Price List of Parts dated Aug. 5, 1928. Why would Ford insert a 1924 Ruckstell price list when printing this Ford list originally in 1928?


IMG_1431.JPG
The best way is always the simplest. The attics of the world are cluttered up with complicated failures. Henry Ford
Don’t find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain. Henry Ford


Topic author
Original Smith
Posts: 3284
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 10:43 am
First Name: Larry
Last Name: Smith
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 13 Touring, 13 Roadster, 17 Coupelet, 25 Roadster P/U
Location: Lomita, California
MTFCA Number: 121
MTFCA Life Member: YES
MTFCI Number: 16310

Re: Parts Books

Post by Original Smith » Thu May 19, 2022 10:56 am

I just bought a NOS Parts list dated May 1, 1929. The thickness of the paper is the same for all pages, and of course, there is no Ruckstell insert!

User avatar

DanTreace
Posts: 3299
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:56 am
First Name: Dan
Last Name: Treace
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: '23 cutoff, '25 touring, '27 touring
Location: North Central FL
MTFCA Number: 4838
MTFCI Number: 115
Board Member Since: 2000
Contact:

Re: Parts Books

Post by DanTreace » Thu May 19, 2022 4:26 pm

Larry

Have always considered the addition of Ruckstell parts in that reprint Price and Parts List as an error. And likely it has contributed to the myth that Ford provided Ruckstell Axles on the assembly line at either a Ford factory or a Ford branch assembly plant across the nation.

Can't be true, as Ford carefully controlled just in time inventory of assembly parts for these cars across the country. And Ts were made to factory specs too.

Now, certainly Ford dealers or agents with Ford cars, or the many private auto garages that worked on Fords would have installed the accessory axles, that was common. Interesting, the many original sales invoices that survive from such dealers note other accessories, like locking steering wheels and bumpers. Haven't yet seen such a sales dealer invoice to a customer that notes install of a Ruckstell, but certain they did.

As for Edsel Ford, he did meet with Hall about those new Ruckstells in 1922, and was shipped one from CA to Detroit. His notes on the memo are written to direct this item to Galamb, what happened? Did Edsel ever try it out? Did a Ford car get this installed to test the axle, was there any documented results or actions???? Who knows!




IMG_2394.JPG
The best way is always the simplest. The attics of the world are cluttered up with complicated failures. Henry Ford
Don’t find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain. Henry Ford


Kerry
Posts: 1297
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 2:42 pm
First Name: Frank
Last Name: van Ekeren
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1916 touring, 1916 pick-up, 1924 coupe, 1926 touring, 1927 touring
Location: Rosedale Vic Australia

Re: Parts Books

Post by Kerry » Thu May 19, 2022 4:43 pm

The original 1928 Canadian over seas editions have the Ruckstell in it.


YellowTRacer
Posts: 434
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 6:55 pm
First Name: Ed
Last Name: Archer
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1909 replica Transcontinental race car, 1915 2 man race car, 1918 American bodied speedster
Location: 1807 East Ave. Hayward, CA 94541
MTFCA Number: 19
MTFCA Life Member: YES
Board Member Since: 2009

Re: Parts Books

Post by YellowTRacer » Thu May 19, 2022 5:12 pm

I learned many years ago that any reprint of anu kind is suspect.

Ed aka #4

User avatar

A Whiteman
Posts: 992
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 3:36 pm
First Name: Adrian
Last Name: Whiteman
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926 TT, 1924 Colonial Roadster, 1924 'Bullnose' Morris, 1925 'Bullnose' Morris, 1936 JD AR
Location: South Island, New Zealand

Re: Parts Books

Post by A Whiteman » Thu May 19, 2022 5:38 pm

It appears to me that the reprint is a collection of two documents for the convenience of owners and restorers. That is how I use it.
For collectors of documents this would be an important issue, for owners looking for information it was a great idea I think.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic