26/27 Block
Forum rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules
-
Topic author - Posts: 44
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 5:19 pm
- First Name: Tony
- Last Name: Howard
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926 Tourer 1925 Coup
- Location: Upper Tenthill. Qld. 4343 Australia
26/27 Block
Just scratching through the spare block department looking for a useful 26/27 one.
This is a candidate but without a serial number. ( Aussie Serial Numbers are generally preceded by C xxxxxx from Canada factory)
I understand that unmarked blocks were used as replacements and that the service agent was supposed to stamp the number of the block being replaced , which was sometimes not done.
The casting date appears to be 12/1/C.... were these blocks cast in 1925, as the C would indicate?
What is the significance of the S7 casting in the block?
This is a candidate but without a serial number. ( Aussie Serial Numbers are generally preceded by C xxxxxx from Canada factory)
I understand that unmarked blocks were used as replacements and that the service agent was supposed to stamp the number of the block being replaced , which was sometimes not done.
The casting date appears to be 12/1/C.... were these blocks cast in 1925, as the C would indicate?
What is the significance of the S7 casting in the block?
Government - because people struggle to ruin their lives by themselves
-
- Posts: 3923
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:00 pm
- First Name: John
- Last Name: Kuehn
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 19 Roadster, 21 Touring, 24 Coupe
- Location: Texas
- MTFCA Number: 28924
Re: 26/27 Block
Does it have all the valves still in it? Must still have the cam in it. Maybe if was a used replacement that wasn’t stamped for a reason. Probably won’t know for sure.
Kind of unusual if it was in a running car and not being stamped. Interesting scenario for sure.
Kind of unusual if it was in a running car and not being stamped. Interesting scenario for sure.
-
- Posts: 6443
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2021 10:08 pm
- First Name: Pat
- Last Name: McNallen
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926-7 roadster
- Location: Graham, Texas
- MTFCA Number: 51486
- Board Member Since: 2021
Re: 26/27 Block
Could it be an NOS block assembly? It looks NOS in the picture.
-
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 2:42 pm
- First Name: Frank
- Last Name: van Ekeren
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1916 touring, 1916 pick-up, 1924 coupe, 1926 touring, 1927 touring
- Location: Rosedale Vic Australia
Re: 26/27 Block
12/1 would be a December build so if the C is 1925 that would be right cast for the 26 model, The S7 is more than likely a cast mold number. Not that uncommon to come across no engine number, seen a few, I just finished a re-build of a 26 with no number.
-
- Posts: 3678
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 3:13 pm
- First Name: Wayne
- Last Name: Sheldon
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1915 Runabout 1913 Speedster
- Location: Grass Valley California, USA
- Board Member Since: 2005
Re: 26/27 Block
USA and Canadian policies were similar, but sometimes varied a bit.
The intention was that no stamping blocks should replace a damaged block, and the damaged block's original serial number should be stamped in the appropriate space. A lot of USA replacement blocks had the "Ford" script stamped onto the smooth space twice. Once, angled near the front of the space, and once alternate angled near the back of the space. But not all replacement blocks got those stampings!
Of course, it may be possible that someone ground down the entire space at some point in time to remove the original number? Usually, that can be determined by either poor workmanship, or checking the height of the embossment (they are remarkably uniform!).
USA blocks stopped being date coded in 1922.And I don't know Canadian coding enough to speculate on the year from the date code.
And yes, the S 7 are most likely either mold or pattern codes to track and correct defective castings at the factory. The exact meaning to the numbers and letters appears to have been long forgotten. Once a block passed through several levels of QC and machining? The numbers and letters were of no use anymore.
The two bolt embossments on the back of the block pin it down to being a 1926 or 1927 model year block. It could of course have been used to replace anything back to the beginning of the model T. However, as a replacement for a 1926/'27 car it is as appropriate as you can get!
Good luck!
The intention was that no stamping blocks should replace a damaged block, and the damaged block's original serial number should be stamped in the appropriate space. A lot of USA replacement blocks had the "Ford" script stamped onto the smooth space twice. Once, angled near the front of the space, and once alternate angled near the back of the space. But not all replacement blocks got those stampings!
Of course, it may be possible that someone ground down the entire space at some point in time to remove the original number? Usually, that can be determined by either poor workmanship, or checking the height of the embossment (they are remarkably uniform!).
USA blocks stopped being date coded in 1922.And I don't know Canadian coding enough to speculate on the year from the date code.
And yes, the S 7 are most likely either mold or pattern codes to track and correct defective castings at the factory. The exact meaning to the numbers and letters appears to have been long forgotten. Once a block passed through several levels of QC and machining? The numbers and letters were of no use anymore.
The two bolt embossments on the back of the block pin it down to being a 1926 or 1927 model year block. It could of course have been used to replace anything back to the beginning of the model T. However, as a replacement for a 1926/'27 car it is as appropriate as you can get!
Good luck!
-
- Posts: 381
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 2:33 am
- First Name: Alan
- Last Name: Long
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1910 Canadian Touring Car and 1926 Australian built Utility
- Location: Western Australia
Re: 26/27 Block
I agree with Frank,
“C” is the 1925 Canadian Cast Code for 1925 (D=1926)
Alan In Western Australia
“C” is the 1925 Canadian Cast Code for 1925 (D=1926)
Alan In Western Australia
-
- Posts: 957
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 5:39 pm
- First Name: James
- Last Name: Golden
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926 Model T Roadster
- Location: Bowie, MD
- MTFCA Number: 14294
- MTFCI Number: 13562
Re: 26/27 Block
The USA last month of 1925 engines for the original block was the end of June 1925.
The USA 1926 Model Year started on 3 August 1925 with the new blocks that had the ears on the transmission, but the July month of 1925 had the 1926 engine blocks with the transmission ears and coil box on top.
When Canada made the change is not well known.
The USA 1926 Model Year started on 3 August 1925 with the new blocks that had the ears on the transmission, but the July month of 1925 had the 1926 engine blocks with the transmission ears and coil box on top.
When Canada made the change is not well known.
-
- Posts: 1057
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2019 1:20 pm
- First Name: Joe
- Last Name: Bell
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 24 Fordor
- Location: Tiffin Ohio
- MTFCI Number: 24066
Re: 26/27 Block
Some one has ground the serial number off of it, can see grinding marks!
-
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2020 3:51 pm
- First Name: William
- Last Name: May
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1914 Runabout
- Location: Tucson, Arizona
Re: 26/27 Block
The "S7" is probably the pattern number, so if they had flaws, they would know which pattern was causing the problems. Patterns have only a limited life, based on how hard they are used.
I have some REO running board brackets that actually show the wood grain from the pattern, as they were too cheap or too careless to bother with touching up patterns that had sections missing. This was also an indication that the parts were just cast iron, rather than being forgings.
I have some REO running board brackets that actually show the wood grain from the pattern, as they were too cheap or too careless to bother with touching up patterns that had sections missing. This was also an indication that the parts were just cast iron, rather than being forgings.