Page 1 of 1

different Ruckstell shift bracket

Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2023 9:57 pm
by KWTownsend
I have three different types of Ruckstell shift brackets. All are center shift. One has the splines and the rod crosses over the drive shaft.
Ruckell shift lever.jpg
Another was designed for the TT truck. The rod is on the driver side and goes straight back to the shift lock. This is possible because the TT truck battery is up front by the running board. On both of these designs, the bracket is bolted onto the front side of the flange of the 4th main bearing
Ruckell shift lever TT.jpg
I have a third style bracket that bolts onto the back side of the fourth main bearing flange.
Ruckstell Shift bracket.jpg
I'm just curious, does anyone know when this style was used? Early? Late? Special application?

Thanks!

: ^ )

Keith

Re: different Ruckstell shift bracket

Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2023 10:14 pm
by ThreePedalTapDancer
I believe that’s an early Ruckstell Perfecto shifter.

http://www.mtfca.com/discus/messages/11 ... 1279142762

IMG_1865.jpeg

Re: different Ruckstell shift bracket

Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2023 10:16 pm
by Norman Kling
All three of mine have the first kind . One is a 22 Roadster and the other 2 are 26 Roadster and Touring. The one in the 22 was there when I bought it and the other two I installed.
Norm

Re: different Ruckstell shift bracket

Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2023 8:26 am
by DanTreace
Have two of that first kind, one has the nicer splined shaft, the other is square shaft.

The spine is nice for getting the shift arm where you want it!


Spline shaft on right:
Sqaure on left, spline on rightI  .jpg
Square type.JPG

Re: different Ruckstell shift bracket

Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2023 11:49 am
by jsaylor
The square shaft one may have been a modern reproduction. I had one and it never fit right.

Re: different Ruckstell shift bracket

Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2023 12:32 pm
by RajoRacer
Square shaft was regular until Eaton bought out Ruckstell, according to Original Smith which introduced the splined shifter - hope I got that correct Larry !