Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Discuss all things Model T related.
Forum rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules

Topic author
babychadwick
Posts: 164
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:03 am
First Name: Chad
Last Name: Azevedo
Location: Key Largo
Contact:

Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by babychadwick » Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:16 pm

While not a model T I believe this is on topic. Recently a friend who passed and loved old cars had a funeral procession so we (my son and I) took the '38 Zephyr (4 door sedan). A message was just delivered to me that if I was seen driving the car with him in the back seat (he is back there with the doors locked) the police would be alerted and I would be arrested! Normally I wouldn't pay much attention but he happens to be involved with the fire department. I have spoken with the police as we are often driving the car and they are aware of the vehicles construction and that he rides in the back unrestrained. Where we drive the maximum speed is 45 and its a divided straight road so we aren't talking highway speeds.


Humblej
Posts: 439
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 12:23 pm
First Name: Jeff
Last Name: Humble
Location: Charlevoix, Mi
Board Member Since: 2006

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Humblej » Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:32 pm

I do not understand. All states require young children to be in the back seat. Although that may be an airbag thing, the back IS where kids sit. If his issue is there are no seatbelts, well, old cars are grandfathered out of that, so again where is his beef? I would chalk it up to an unknowledgable but well meaning citizen, who has no authority to issue a ticket or recommend arresting anyone. Stupid people are everywhere, dont let it ruin your day.
Last edited by Humblej on Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.


John kuehn
Posts: 886
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:00 pm
First Name: John
Last Name: Kuehn
Location: Texas
MTFCA Number: 28924

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by John kuehn » Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:41 pm

Maybe the guy was thinking that the kiddo should have been in a belted car seat. Your suppose to do that in Texas. Don’t know about anywhere else. But the car didn’t have factory seatbelts in it .Depending on the judge it would be a judgement call. I have a feeling he would rule for the kiddos safety. But again it would depend on the judge if it went that far. My opinion of course.


Dallas Landers
Posts: 1504
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 12:26 pm
First Name: Dallas
Last Name: Landers
Location: N.E. Indiana
MTFCA Number: 49995

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Dallas Landers » Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:42 pm

Sounds like long nose do gooders. A ticket would be the 1st order if the law would support such a thing. Not sure about our local laws but my grandkids ride in my old cars and never had a problem. I guess I would have a few choice words for the do gooder but I wouldnt go looking for them. It would suprise me if they had kids of their own. Usually those are the ones telling everyone else how to raise their kids. Keep that young man interested in this old iron, he will be the future.
My 2 cents

User avatar

henryford2
Posts: 315
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 4:14 pm
First Name: Joseph
Last Name: Andulics
Location: North Ridgeville, OH
MTFCA Number: 9766
Contact:

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by henryford2 » Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:57 pm

Lock me up
IMG_4659.JPG
Always looking for vintage Whizzer engines, bikes & parts. What do you have?

User avatar

Henry K. Lee
Posts: 2478
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:09 am
First Name: Henry
Last Name: Lee
Location: South Pittsburg, TN
MTFCA Number: 479
MTFCA Life Member: YES

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Henry K. Lee » Wed Oct 30, 2019 8:14 pm

Well, The DOT laws do state that antique/vintage vehicles follow the "Rules" of year of manufacture! So what is the beef? I had an issue once with my 1960 English Ford Zephyr, yes a child is to be restrained in the back seat, if the vehicle has a restraining device and mounted per instructed by the manufacture.

Some People!

Hank


Topic author
babychadwick
Posts: 164
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:03 am
First Name: Chad
Last Name: Azevedo
Location: Key Largo
Contact:

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by babychadwick » Wed Oct 30, 2019 8:18 pm

The point being he may be in a position to convince officers to give me a hard time as opposed to some random citizen.


Bmettli
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2019 8:46 pm
First Name: Brian
Last Name: Mettling
Location: Oakwood, Ohio
Board Member Since: 2013

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Bmettli » Wed Oct 30, 2019 8:19 pm

:roll: My 4 year old daughter sits in my lap all the time and helps drives the car down our quiet neighborhood blvd. cop has come past before and given a wave and smile.

Kids bounce around all the time in our car IF it’s in the neighborhood on sides streets. HOWEVER I wouldn’t dream of taking them on the open road in traffic. People are plain nuts, scary enough driving them in a normal car :)

Throwing a stroller on the car running board is a whole different animal!
99D6E6E9-9D85-4F70-8B56-B7A6FBA6B821.jpeg

User avatar

Oldav8tor
Posts: 581
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:39 am
First Name: Tim
Last Name: Juhl
Location: Thumb of Michigan
MTFCA Number: 50297
MTFCI Number: 24810

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Oldav8tor » Wed Oct 30, 2019 8:43 pm

Another consideration is that an improperly installed car seat is often worse than no car seat at all. In Michigan, the rules apply are those in force when the car was built....that doesn't mean you can't be hassled by ill-informed officials, but it won't stand.
1917 Touring
1946 Aeronca Champ
1952 Willys M38a1 Jeep
1953 Ford Jubilee Tractor


BHarper
Posts: 96
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:15 am
First Name: Bill
Last Name: Harper
Location: Keene, New Hampshire
MTFCA Number: 5414
MTFCA Life Member: YES
Board Member Since: 1999

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by BHarper » Wed Oct 30, 2019 9:57 pm

On our way to prison:


36271746_10100166759619634_4806028628531871744_n.jpg


These grandchildren of mine call the grandfather on their father's side "Grandpa."
They distinguish me as "Grandpa Model T."


If we do not introduce children to our cars who will be interested in them after we are gone?

User avatar

KWTownsend
Posts: 388
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 6:51 pm
First Name: Keith
Last Name: Townsend
Location: Gresham, Orygun
MTFCA Number: 14778
MTFCA Life Member: YES
MTFCI Number: 16305
Board Member Since: 1999

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by KWTownsend » Wed Oct 30, 2019 10:33 pm

Chad-

Tell them, "I appreciate your concern regarding the welfare of my children. I take care of my children as I see fit, as I'm sure you do with yours. As a mandatory reporter of child neglect and abuse, I'm sure you would understand those are the instances when I would stick my nose into the business of someone else raising their kids. I hope you can join us on a tour someday."
Keith, Spencer & Justice 1915.jpg
No, we weren't driving with him on my lap, but we were three across, probably driving the same as you.

: ^ )

Keith


Burger in Spokane
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2019 2:05 am
First Name: Brent
Last Name: Burger
Location: Spokane, Wa.
Board Member Since: 2014

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Burger in Spokane » Wed Oct 30, 2019 10:37 pm

So, the do-gooder had the pistachios to put his name on the note ?

When a situation like this comes up, I want to be securely in a position to take on a
challenge. In this case, I'd dig in to know the law forward and back, and perhaps even
keep one of those legal eagles in my sidepocket, in case the do-gooder decides to
become a crusader. Then operate well within what you know to be a legally secure
position, and let your do-gooder go pound sand.
More people are doing it today than ever before !

User avatar

FreighTer Jim
Posts: 897
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:50 am
First Name: James
Last Name: Jarzabek
Location: Dayton, OH
MTFCA Number: 29562
MTFCI Number: 24398
Board Member Since: 2008
Contact:

Do The Hokey In The Pokey

Post by FreighTer Jim » Wed Oct 30, 2019 10:46 pm

Will your local law enforcement let you share a cell with the Young Uns’ .... 🧐

Cause then you can do the Hokey Whilst In The Pokey ... 😎


FJ


jachady
Posts: 92
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2019 11:16 pm
First Name: John
Last Name: Chady
Location: Jefferson WI
Board Member Since: 2016

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by jachady » Wed Oct 30, 2019 10:49 pm

In Wisconsin children under 5 must follow child safety seat and restraint laws. If the car doesn't have the proper measures to restrain, then they can't ride. Over 5 and the child has to be restrained if there are restraint devices (factory standard or aftermarket).

Its going to be so hard not to take my little girl out in the T for 5 years. :(

User avatar

ewdysar
Posts: 114
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2019 6:48 pm
First Name: Eric
Last Name: Dysart
Location: SoCal

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by ewdysar » Wed Oct 30, 2019 11:10 pm

I guess that it depends on the traffic laws in your state, but most states have laws like this:

In Georgia: Child Car Seat Laws
Children under 8 years old must ride in an approved safety seat or booster that is suited for their height and weight.
Children 8 years old and under must ride in the back seat...
Children over 8 years old must wear a seat belt.
Any child over 4 ft 9 in may use a seat belt in lieu of a booster seat.
Kids not requiring child seats may ride in front, provided he or she is older than 8 years old.

Current California Law:
Children under 2 years of age shall ride in a rear-facing car seat unless the child weighs 40 or more pounds OR is 40 or more inches tall. The child shall be secured in a manner that complies with the height and weight limits specified by the manufacturer of the car seat. (California Vehicle Code Section 27360.)
​Children under the age of 8 must be secured in a car seat or booster seat in the back seat.
Children who are 8 years of age OR have reached 4’9” in height may be secured by a booster seat, but at a minimum must be secured by a safety belt. (California Vehicle Code Section 27363.)
Passengers who are 16 years of age and over are subject to California's Mandatory Seat Belt law.

It’s pretty easy to google the child car seat laws in your own state, these were the first two that came up for me without specifying a location.

While seat belt restrictions are generally waived for vintage vehicles that were not originally equipped, I have not seen a similar waiver for car seat use for small children, regardless of the vehicle.

So whether or not we personally choose to comply with the law, breaking the law may result in tickets and/or fines. Whether one exceeds the posted speed limit, uses their cell phone while driving, or carries small children in any car without restraint, recognize that you run the possibility of getting the attention of the local constabulary. Maybe they will care, maybe they will not. But as various police officers impressed upon me in my younger days, “ignorance of the law is no excuse”, and in my experience, willful disobedience fares no better.

I am not supporting either side of this discussion, just providing facts for consideration.

Eric

PS. My daughter who just turned 3 has only been in my Ts when parked. Her mother won’t let her ride in the car(s) illegally.


Topic author
babychadwick
Posts: 164
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:03 am
First Name: Chad
Last Name: Azevedo
Location: Key Largo
Contact:

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by babychadwick » Wed Oct 30, 2019 11:21 pm

Eric those laws are for most every state just as seat belt laws are for every state. They do not address that there are no mounting options for cars that never came with restraints. As old v8 stated it may be more unsafe to place a child in improper restraints. Placing a child in a car seat is fine so long as a car seat is restrained. As the law states a child "must be in a seat" but that seat has no means of restraint and tying someone into a seat in a moving car will injure that child unless some restraint is fabricated. Much testing is done in order to make restraints safe. I for one don't intend to offer my car up for testing and am not an engineer so it might as well be restrained with dental floss.

User avatar

AndyClary
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:15 am
First Name: Andrew
Last Name: Clary
Location: Usa
MTFCA Number: 24057

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by AndyClary » Wed Oct 30, 2019 11:45 pm

What it comes down to is the mood of the officer involved. The laws don't say car seat if vehicle has belts, it says must be in a properly secured car seat. If the car seat can't be properly installed then the law can and probably should say the child can't ride in the car. It's probably an unpopular opinion on this forum, but it's not safe for a baby/toddler to ride unsecured.

Andy

User avatar

ewdysar
Posts: 114
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2019 6:48 pm
First Name: Eric
Last Name: Dysart
Location: SoCal

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by ewdysar » Wed Oct 30, 2019 11:48 pm

I think that John C. got it right for children that require a suitable car seat with “ If the car doesn't have the proper measures to restrain, then they can't ride.” Once you get to the age and/or size that they can legally use just a seat belt, then the YOM considerations start to apply. But that is merely my interpretation of the laws as stated above. Attempt to argue the seat belt exception into car seat requirements at your own risk.

Eric


Scott_Conger
Posts: 2459
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:18 am
First Name: Scott
Last Name: Conger
Location: Clark, WY
Board Member Since: 2005

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Scott_Conger » Wed Oct 30, 2019 11:58 pm

Chad

In part, from Florida Drivers' Handbook: The driver and front seat passengers must wear seat belts. The seat belt law applies to passenger cars manufactured beginning with the 1968 model year, and trucks beginning with the 1972 model year. All restraint requirements are subordinate to the beginning statement above.

In any other instance, in FL it's a $60 ticket and a few points on your license. As far as "giving you a hard time", they can only give you the hard time that you allow. I would imagine an appology and pleading the case that you were not aware would relieve you of 1/2 of all stops if you are polite. If the officer has indeed got it in for you, You're required to show license and insurance and registration, then sign the ticket. You don't even have to speak to them. Certainly do not argue. They cannot make it any worse for you than that. Period. No arrests. No searches. This isn't Cuba or Venezuela. Yet. Remind your "friend" of that. Any such ticket recieved in that car could easily be beaten in court. Though the police are expected to enforce the law as written, with the plethora of laws that can be broken, and the myriad of details and variances of those laws, it places the officer at as much disadvantage as the motoring public.

I know that most folks do not know what the Constitution says, but we still live in a free country and are free to keep our mouths shut. It's a skill few have mastered, as it isn't easy or natural for most.

Don't lose sleep over this and enjoy your car with your son. I've never read anything from you that indicates that you are reckless or have anything but sound decision making ability. Do what you believe is prudent.
Last edited by Scott_Conger on Thu Oct 31, 2019 12:34 am, edited 2 times in total.
Scott Conger

Full Flow Float Valves - deliver fuel like Henry intended!


Mark Osterman
Posts: 669
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:18 pm
First Name: Mark
Last Name: Osterman
Location: Rochester, NY

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Mark Osterman » Thu Oct 31, 2019 12:26 am

I can’t imagine driving a model T with anything in my lap.


DHort
Posts: 735
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 1:30 pm
First Name: DAVID
Last Name: HJORTNAES
Location: Men Falls, WI
MTFCA Number: 28762
MTFCI Number: 22402

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by DHort » Thu Oct 31, 2019 1:03 am

Mark, try to imagine a small child in a Speedster. As long as they can sit still, but then that is only down the block at a very slow speed. You at least have sides in your car.


Allan
Posts: 1127
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:21 pm
First Name: Allan
Last Name: Bennett
Location: Gawler, Australia

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Allan » Thu Oct 31, 2019 1:36 am

I was anti the child seat restraint laws introduced for old cars in the eastern states when they were introduced. No restraint, no ride until the kids are 8 years old. Then they brought it in in our state.

My son and I devised mountings in the back seat of my 1924 tourer, two sets actually. The loops are welded to an angle iron frame, the frame is screwed down to the seat base and the seat base riser. The child seat comes with the belts to make the connection. The tether strap which stops the seat tipping forward, goes between the back curtain of the top and the back of the car and is attached to spare tyre iron which is bolted to the frame. The actual fitting on the tyre carrier is one taken from a modern car. My son's auto engineer friend suggested all we need for the fitting to pass inspection was to link the angle iron frame to the car frame underneath. We may do that yet. All of this is unseen when the seat is removed.

I have overcome my initial opposition to the law. There is nothing quite as re-assuring as knowing our precious cargo is restrained in one place and does not require constant checking. He gets to see more of the countryside from his raised seat, and when he gets bored with that he nods off just as he does in the modern.

As our engineer friend said, our set-up may not be engineered to failsafe expectations, but if it ever gives out, we are already in deep trouble. Meanwhile, the good officers have been satisfied.

Compliant Allan from down under.


John kuehn
Posts: 886
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:00 pm
First Name: John
Last Name: Kuehn
Location: Texas
MTFCA Number: 28924

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by John kuehn » Thu Oct 31, 2019 10:53 am

Without even thinking about it or seeing pictures of folks driving along with small kids in their lap I wouldn’t drive any vehicle much less a Model T with kids in my lap. That ain’t smart.


Adam
Posts: 564
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:57 am
First Name: Adam
Last Name: Doleshal
Location: Wisconsin
MTFCA Number: 23809
MTFCI Number: 1
Board Member Since: 2000

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Adam » Thu Oct 31, 2019 11:18 am

Read the state statutes for your state instead of asking opinions here. They are the factual information you need and are available online on your state’s website.

To my knowledge, most states can not prevent children from riding in a car without seatbelts if seatbelts were not original equipment.

Did you know: It is a violation of FEDERAL LAW to sell any car in which you have installed seat belts that have not been Federally approved! (I think this tells you what the Federal Government thinks about the safety of “Homemade” seatbelts)


Burger in Spokane
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2019 2:05 am
First Name: Brent
Last Name: Burger
Location: Spokane, Wa.
Board Member Since: 2014

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Burger in Spokane » Thu Oct 31, 2019 11:47 am

One more reason to own a TT flatbed. Pile the kids up and strap 'em down like a
load of lumber. Too easy ! :shock:
More people are doing it today than ever before !


Derek Kiefer
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2019 2:12 pm
First Name: Derek
Last Name: Kiefer
Location: Mantorville, MN
Board Member Since: 2011

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Derek Kiefer » Thu Oct 31, 2019 11:47 am

My response to that would not be appropriate for this forum.


John Dow
Posts: 95
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2019 10:21 am
First Name: John
Last Name: Dow
Location: Leawood, Ks
MTFCA Number: 32344
MTFCI Number: 24459

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by John Dow » Thu Oct 31, 2019 11:55 am

I wear a size 3XL orange Department of Corrections jumpsuit.
OP PARADE 2016.jpg
OP PARADE 2016.jpg (25.82 KiB) Viewed 3904 times


Russ T Fender
Posts: 166
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 5:39 pm
First Name: Val
Last Name: Soupios
Location: Jupiter Florida

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Russ T Fender » Thu Oct 31, 2019 12:16 pm

I think Florida deleted the exemption for cars not originally equipped with seat belts, at least as it applies to children and the use of car seats. That is what a police officer told me when he pulled me over for having two of my grandkids in the back seat of my touring. He just gave me a warning but it sure ruined things for my grandkids. If he was wrong I'd like to know about it because my grandkids keep begging me for rides.

User avatar

ewdysar
Posts: 114
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2019 6:48 pm
First Name: Eric
Last Name: Dysart
Location: SoCal

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by ewdysar » Thu Oct 31, 2019 1:06 pm

Hey Val,

I think that the officer that gave you the warning is probably correct. Seat belt requirements and car seat requirements are not the same thing. While many states (maybe all states) have waivers for use of seat belts based on OEM or YOM, I’m not aware of any state that extends those waivers to car seat requirements. As you can see in my first post in this thread, while most states have car seat requirements for small children and those requirements are similar in intent, each state has different criteria for when a child can “graduate” to using just a seat belt. So check your local DMV/DOT regulations to see when your kids or grandkids qualify for using seat belts alone, then the YOM seat belt waivers go into effect and they become “Model T eligible”. I recognize that this is a conservative interpretation of the laws as stated, but I don’t think that here is any chance of running afoul of the law by following these guidelines.

We’re all free to obey laws as we see fit, just be prepared for the consequences of those decisions.

Keep crankin’
Eric

User avatar

RustyFords
Posts: 1020
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:16 am
First Name: Don
Last Name: Allen
Location: Houston, TX
MTFCA Number: 50001

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by RustyFords » Thu Oct 31, 2019 1:18 pm

I don't take threats very well...like...not well at all. I'm one of the most pleasant, happy, smiling, generous people you'll ever know....until you threaten me or my loved ones (or any random child or otherwise helpless person).

After that, I get quiet and mean. But that's just the me that the military and my grouchy old grandfather created. My wife has asked me to work on this character flaw, and I've tried, but at 50 years of age, neither she nor I hold out much hope of it changing in any significant way.

So...I wouldn't have handled the threatening note you received very well at all.
1924 Touring

User avatar

ewdysar
Posts: 114
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2019 6:48 pm
First Name: Eric
Last Name: Dysart
Location: SoCal

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by ewdysar » Thu Oct 31, 2019 2:09 pm

Hi Don,

I’m going to start by saying that I am not judging the person who wrote the note nor your response.

But I found your statement “ until you threaten me or my loved ones (or any random child or otherwise helpless person). ” worthy of discussion. It sounds like you are a straight forward, upstanding guy. So if you observed a situation where you felt that a random small child was being put in harms way, would you a) confront the situation physically in person, b) write a note to avoid the possibility of blowing the situation out of control, or c) walk away and do nothing.

Consider that the person who wrote the note apparently thought that Chad was putting a child in harms way and that he did not want to get in Chad’s face about it, but also could not just walk away in good conscience. So just think about what you might have done if you were him... To me, that guy sounds like a lot of good people in this group, and if we heard the story from his perspective, we might be commending him for trying to right a wrong without causing a scene.

Again, I’m not judging anyone’s opinion here, just encouraging everyone to think about all sides of whole situation. If after doing so, your position doesn’t change, then good. You’re probably living up to your personal moral standards. And I will admit that I am not always the man that I would like to be, but I’m trying....

Keep crankin’
Eric

User avatar

RustyFords
Posts: 1020
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:16 am
First Name: Don
Last Name: Allen
Location: Houston, TX
MTFCA Number: 50001

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by RustyFords » Thu Oct 31, 2019 2:19 pm

Eric. I'll be concise.

1) The child was not in harm's way.
2) If the do-gooder was a real man (or woman), that person would've respectfully spoken to the driver instead of leaving a note.
3) The do-gooder wasn't a real man (or woman), but that person could've still written a constructive note, suggesting alternatives. But no...they threatened to get the law involved and incarceration.
4) I said I don't do well with threats to children. The child was not being threatened. Not even close.

My reclusive neighbor's yard started looking like hell recently. He was in clear violation of the HOA deed restrictions. We're not an uppity neighborhood, but we don't want it to look like the the houses are abandoned. Instead of threatening the neighbor with a report to the HOA, I went and spoke with him respectfully. He said he'd been neglecting the yardwork, partially because his mower is a piece of junk and said that he'd get on it asap. I helped him mow and edge that weekend. We had a beer. No threats. Looks like the magneto in his mower is filthy and needs cleaning/adjusting. I'm going to fix that for him as soon as I get a chance.
Last edited by RustyFords on Thu Oct 31, 2019 3:06 pm, edited 3 times in total.
1924 Touring


Topic author
babychadwick
Posts: 164
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:03 am
First Name: Chad
Last Name: Azevedo
Location: Key Largo
Contact:

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by babychadwick » Thu Oct 31, 2019 2:50 pm

The message delivered was not in the form of a note. He went to my ex to have her tell me (I have full custody). Yes, he knows me. Yes, he had ample opportunity to come over and talk to me as we had been waiting for the funeral procession to start with all the cars stopped and people walking around for maybe an hour.

User avatar

Fordwright
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2019 4:14 pm
First Name: Greg
Last Name: Popove
Location: Olds AB

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Fordwright » Thu Oct 31, 2019 3:08 pm

I think antique cars are exempt from most safety regulations in most places, which constitutes a special privilege to those allowed to drive them on public roads. It also entails a responsibility to keep yourself and your passengers as safe as possible. Remaining on back roads and streets, and limiting the number of trips you make, particularly carrying passengers helps reduce the risk of serious injury.

For someone wanting to drive their vintage car as their every-day vehicle, they should consider mitigating some of the risks by upgrading features like lights, axles and brakes, hopefully in ways that don't alter the vintage appearance of the vehicle too much. Replacing the original plate glass with safety glass is also an excellent idea. Seat belts are also a very good idea.


Sparknwire
Posts: 77
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 3:01 pm
First Name: RJ
Last Name: Lucyszyn
Location: Walworth, NY

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Sparknwire » Thu Oct 31, 2019 3:25 pm

Personally speaking I would tell that busybody to rub rock salt and bite me. Old cars never came with seat belts just like turn signals. It’s your preference if you want to put them in

User avatar

Henry K. Lee
Posts: 2478
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:09 am
First Name: Henry
Last Name: Lee
Location: South Pittsburg, TN
MTFCA Number: 479
MTFCA Life Member: YES

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Henry K. Lee » Thu Oct 31, 2019 3:31 pm

So it is OK for your child to play contact football, get CTE, be a burden on society and only talking about all the good times in high school football days. Un fit for military service due to a school sport injury. I think those same morons are in government passing these seat belt laws!!!?

Hank

User avatar

ewdysar
Posts: 114
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2019 6:48 pm
First Name: Eric
Last Name: Dysart
Location: SoCal

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by ewdysar » Thu Oct 31, 2019 3:33 pm

Good enough Don.

After your concise and careful introspection, I can see that you are strong, just, and righteous, and the other guy was weak and scum. In your judgement, the child was not in harms way. In his judgement, the child was in harms way. You are Right, and he is Wrong. I can live with that.

Anyway, I’ve got no dog in this hunt. I usually know better than to step into this kind of conversation.

Back to lurking...
Eric

User avatar

Charlie B in N.J.
Posts: 289
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:40 am
First Name: CHARLIE
Last Name: BRANCA
Location: Brick N.J.
MTFCA Number: 28967
Board Member Since: 2010

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Charlie B in N.J. » Thu Oct 31, 2019 4:21 pm

I am always totally amazed at how many of you completey ignore and (worse) make light of common sense safety when it involves children. Don't you realize that even if a child is in an approved safety seat properly belted in and correctly used in a Model T the chances of coming out unscathed in an accident are just about zero? What the heck don't you understand ? Driving with a child in your lap ? I wouldn't have the pits to even tell anyone I did that never mind posting a picture of it. You need to be locked up not waved at. It's damn near child abuse. Does something horrible need to happen ? Because you're begging for it. Don't bother trying to justify stupidity either.
Forget everything you thought you knew.

User avatar

steve plowman
Posts: 45
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2019 5:58 pm
First Name: Steve
Last Name: Plowman
Location: Highlands of Scotland

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by steve plowman » Thu Oct 31, 2019 4:28 pm

As the youngest of 4 sons i rode in the back of a station wagon sitting on the spare wheel as a kid with the dogs for company, as a father both my kids had proper seats and were in the back. Times move on but its a hard call. I lost my son at the age of 20 in a car accident (when he was driving) after 20 years of trying to keep him safe but do not regret letting him ride in the back of a pick up or sit lap belted in the back of a classic car when he was younger.
1926 T Touring cut down with tray back "The Gin Runner"
1926 TwinT straight 8 project
1928 Indian Chout
1940 Indian 640 Stroker

User avatar

Susanne
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:06 pm
First Name: Susanne
Last Name: Rohner
Location: Northeastern California
MTFCA Number: 464
MTFCA Life Member: YES
Board Member Since: 1999
Contact:

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Susanne » Thu Oct 31, 2019 5:11 pm

If I'm in a roadster, does this mean I have to lock my children in the turtledeck, strapped to a carseat? Since, of course, they can't be in the front seat...

User avatar

aDave
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 10:21 am
First Name: David
Last Name: Dufault
Location: Concord New Hampshire
MTFCA Number: 303
MTFCA Life Member: YES

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by aDave » Thu Oct 31, 2019 5:17 pm

NH Rules...yours may be different:

TITLE XXI
MOTOR VEHICLES
CHAPTER 265
RULES OF THE ROAD
Special Rules
Section 265:107-a
265:107-a Child Passenger Restraints Required. –
I. No person shall drive a motor vehicle on any way while carrying as a passenger a person less than 18 years of age unless such person is wearing a seat or safety belt which is properly adjusted and fastened. Except as provided in paragraph II, no person shall drive a motor vehicle on any way while carrying as a passenger a person less than 18 years of age unless the motor vehicle was designed for and equipped with child passenger restraints in accordance with the safety standards approved by the United States Department of Transportation in 49 C.F.R. section 571.213.
I-a. No person who is less than 18 years of age shall drive a motor vehicle or autocycle on any way unless such person is wearing a seat or safety belt which is properly adjusted and fastened.
I-b. No person shall drive a motor vehicle on any way while carrying as a passenger a person less than 7 years of age unless such passenger is properly fastened and secured by a child restraint system which is in accordance with the safety standards approved by the United States Department of Transportation in 49 C.F.R. section 571.213. If the passenger is 57 inches or more in height, the provisions of this paragraph shall not apply.
II. A person shall not be guilty of a violation of this section if the motor vehicle the person is driving is regularly used to transport passengers for hire, is a school bus weighing more than 10,000 pounds or is a school bus weighing less than 10,000 pounds that was manufactured without safety belts, or there is an individualized education program statement contraindicating the use of restraints, is a vehicle manufactured before 1968, is a motorcycle as defined in RSA 259:63, is an antique motor car or motorcycle as defined in RSA 259:4, or is being operated in a parade authorized by law or ordinance, provided that the parade vehicle is travelling at a speed of no more than 10 miles per hour.
III. Any driver who violates the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a violation, and shall be subject to the following fines:
(a) $50 for a first offense.
(b) $100 for a second or subsequent offense.
IV. A violation of this section shall not be used as evidence of contributory negligence in any civil action.
V. A conviction for violating the provisions of this section shall not preclude prosecution of any other offense for which violation of this section might constitute an element.
VI. [Repealed.]
Source. 1983, 45:1. 1987, 240:1. 1989, 302:1. 1993, 21:1. 1995, 6:1. 1997, 244:1-4. 1999, 227:1. 2000, 19:1. 2003, 55:1. 2005, 177:24. 2006, 142:1, 2. 2008, 274:32. 2013, 246:1, eff. Jan. 1, 2014. 2015, 222:6, eff. July 1, 2015.


Dallas Landers
Posts: 1504
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 12:26 pm
First Name: Dallas
Last Name: Landers
Location: N.E. Indiana
MTFCA Number: 49995

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Dallas Landers » Thu Oct 31, 2019 5:21 pm

Chad, yes you should be upset! This is getting way out of hand. Bashing others and attacks on character. This thread will probably be gone soon so I am giving you my opinion to your question.
Please keep the young ones involved in the old cars. Its funny how government control becomes normal even in the older generation after many years of having it shoved down your throat. Common sense will keep you from harm most times the way it has for generations. Come on, we all grew up without seat belts and survived riding in the back of pickups. In 35 years as a fifefighter I have seen traffic accident deaths down. Not as much seatbelts as crumple zones built into vehicles. I have seen seatbelts save lives and take them. Some here would have a fit if the seen what Amish kids do on the farm and roads . Ok, now some can start burning me down for my opinion but there it is. Bottom line , keep the kids having fun in the old cars because they are the future of this great hobby.


Scott_Conger
Posts: 2459
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:18 am
First Name: Scott
Last Name: Conger
Location: Clark, WY
Board Member Since: 2005

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Scott_Conger » Thu Oct 31, 2019 5:25 pm

Val and Chad:

State of Florida Seat Belt Laws
In a car crash you are much more likely to be killed if you are not wearing a seat belt. That is why Florida has seat belt laws. The law states that the front seat passengers must wear seat belts. This law applies to any car manufactured since 1968. in addition, all passengers under 18 years old must wear a seat belt or be otherwise restrained by a child car seat. It is against the law to operate a vehicle if all the passengers do not meet these standards

https://www.dmvflorida.org/florida-traf ... -belt-laws

As I had stated previously, most law enforcement is not going to know about this. Regarding child restraints, they all require a seat belt and mandatory installation/use of seatbelts in FL are for cars manufactured 1968 and later
Scott Conger

Full Flow Float Valves - deliver fuel like Henry intended!


Russ T Fender
Posts: 166
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 5:39 pm
First Name: Val
Last Name: Soupios
Location: Jupiter Florida

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Russ T Fender » Thu Oct 31, 2019 5:47 pm

Well I guess my grandkids won't be able to ride in my cars until they are 18. Hope I live long enough to see that day. Right now I would have to live to be 91 and that assumes I won't have more grandkids! There is a risk in everything we do and a reward associated with that risk! Depriving me and my grandkids from an opportunity to bond and enjoy a hobby that I would like to pass on to them seems to be a situation where the risk pales in comparison to the rewards! Just my opinion!


Scott_Conger
Posts: 2459
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:18 am
First Name: Scott
Last Name: Conger
Location: Clark, WY
Board Member Since: 2005

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Scott_Conger » Thu Oct 31, 2019 5:51 pm

Val

you must not have looked at my link. They're perfectly legal in FL.
Scott Conger

Full Flow Float Valves - deliver fuel like Henry intended!

User avatar

Charlie B in N.J.
Posts: 289
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:40 am
First Name: CHARLIE
Last Name: BRANCA
Location: Brick N.J.
MTFCA Number: 28967
Board Member Since: 2010

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Charlie B in N.J. » Thu Oct 31, 2019 6:07 pm

adave's post; you cannot give rides to 18 year olds or younger unless the vehicle was designed with proper belts & restraints. They are not wrong and yet still folks here are still justifying their actions. Your kid can't ride in a roadster ? Well no. Not safely. You lived through riding unstrapped ? Just luck. That's all. And if you didn't you wouldn't be bragging about it here. I stopped giving rides years ago after the rash of single car accidents posted on this Forum. I'd rather be dead myself that be responsible for crippling or killing one of my Grandkids. Not going to happen. Wise up people someone will get hurt or worse. It's happened before.
Forget everything you thought you knew.


It's Bill
Posts: 133
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 6:41 pm
First Name: Bill
Last Name: Hoffer
Location: Newtown, PA
MTFCA Number: 32571
MTFCI Number: 24364
Board Member Since: 2016

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by It's Bill » Thu Oct 31, 2019 6:21 pm



Scott_Conger
Posts: 2459
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:18 am
First Name: Scott
Last Name: Conger
Location: Clark, WY
Board Member Since: 2005

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Scott_Conger » Thu Oct 31, 2019 6:22 pm

You're a hard sell, aren't you Charlie? First, let me say how sorry I am that you have to live in New Jersey, and second, that I see that your state has indeed removed all parental input on this topic.

With respect to the OP:

Florida has seat belt laws. The law states that the front seat passengers must wear seat belts. This law applies to any car manufactured since 1968.

Above is direct cut/paste from the law.

Any adult in a supervisory role over a minor may not believe it is safe, and may not allow it, but it is not illegal

Someone should tell MTFCI that they are supporting illegal goings-on with the Jimmy Walker Award. Not.
Scott Conger

Full Flow Float Valves - deliver fuel like Henry intended!

User avatar

aDave
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 10:21 am
First Name: David
Last Name: Dufault
Location: Concord New Hampshire
MTFCA Number: 303
MTFCA Life Member: YES

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by aDave » Thu Oct 31, 2019 6:41 pm

Charlie,
One must read ALL OF THE RSA...
look at Roman Numeral II and see these words (please)...

II. A person shall not be guilty of a violation of this section if the motor vehicle the person is driving is...........a vehicle manufactured before 1968,........is an antique motor car or motorcycle as defined in RSA 259:4,............

All "true" Model Ts are exempt in New Hampshire....if you "modify" a '26 Sedan (or any or vehicle made in '68 or earlier) all bets are off.

The problem is not all folks read all the laws in their entirety.

Dave

User avatar

Susanne
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:06 pm
First Name: Susanne
Last Name: Rohner
Location: Northeastern California
MTFCA Number: 464
MTFCA Life Member: YES
Board Member Since: 1999
Contact:

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Susanne » Thu Oct 31, 2019 7:01 pm

Charlie B in N.J. wrote:
Thu Oct 31, 2019 6:07 pm
adave's post; you cannot give rides to 18 year olds or younger unless the vehicle was designed with proper belts & restraints.
I took my driving test in a '15 roadster without seat belts (or turn signals... or back up lamps... or 2 tail/brake lights... or NHTSA approved rollover protection) at the ripe old age of 16 - guess the government should be sued for putting me in such grave danger by having me take a driving test in such an inherantly unsafe vehicle... (or at least for putting the general public in danger by issuing that driver's license issued under such heinous and dangerous conditions...)

I still miss the good old days before we lived in a fear-based litigatuous society that we have to prohibit anybody from doing everything.

User avatar

Fordwright
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2019 4:14 pm
First Name: Greg
Last Name: Popove
Location: Olds AB

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Fordwright » Thu Oct 31, 2019 7:08 pm

Safety is being aware of the risks and dealing with them safely.
Safety has little to do with piling on endless rules, and expecting everyone to respect them all.


Russ T Fender
Posts: 166
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 5:39 pm
First Name: Val
Last Name: Soupios
Location: Jupiter Florida

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Russ T Fender » Thu Oct 31, 2019 8:56 pm

Scott I am confused. I read your link but the cops told me that the exemption for seat belts in cars built prior to 1968 does not apply to children. It is true that I don't need seat belts but according to the police I do have to have them if I want to take my grandkids in the car.
I have been stopped twice and got the same story each time. The cops may be wrong but that doesn't stop them from pulling me over.


Topic author
babychadwick
Posts: 164
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:03 am
First Name: Chad
Last Name: Azevedo
Location: Key Largo
Contact:

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by babychadwick » Thu Oct 31, 2019 9:29 pm

While there are many for and many against child restraints the fact of the matter is that they MUST not be allowed.

Once you go down the dark road and agree that restraints are required, modifying a vehicle to install them based on the law then you must require that they be installed AND tested properly. If you go down this road than EVERY vehicle MUST have restraints for every person in the vehicle and these restraints must pass DOT inspection.

It is impossible to test every antique car's restraints as most vehicles would fail period!

In my mind this is a dark road that will give teeth to the politicians that desire to remove antique cars from the roads completely.


Bmettli
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2019 8:46 pm
First Name: Brian
Last Name: Mettling
Location: Oakwood, Ohio
Board Member Since: 2013

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Bmettli » Thu Oct 31, 2019 9:34 pm

Boy, talk about out of hand, CHARLIE. You’re right, I guess I need to do locked up. This post thread is off the rails with insidious comments such as that. In the meantime, I’ll continue letting the entire neighborhood and families enjoy riding along in the car, along safe and quiet roads, while the long noses judge from the side. Completely uncalled for - I’ve been on this forum for a long time, and it’s the ones that fling poo that give the T community a bad name.
Attachments
989A03CF-A5AC-4624-B1CB-8A445E9D752F.jpeg


Norman Kling
Posts: 663
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 1:39 pm
First Name: Norman
Last Name: Kling
Location: Alpine California

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Norman Kling » Thu Oct 31, 2019 10:03 pm

I don't know how many will scroll down far enough to read this, but I think a very important point has been ignored. The point is that if a child should be killed or seriously injured in a crash, not only will the driver be devistated, but might also face a criminal sentence for driving without proper restraint.

My grandchildren are already adults and my great grandchildren all live over 1,000 miles from here, so we don't often have opportunity to drive them in the T's, but I would only let them ride in the driveway or very short trip on local roads. If they accompany us for a longer drive we would have them ride in another car which is properly equipped. This would be same if they don't come to visit with proper car seat.
Norm


Topic author
babychadwick
Posts: 164
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:03 am
First Name: Chad
Last Name: Azevedo
Location: Key Largo
Contact:

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by babychadwick » Thu Oct 31, 2019 10:19 pm

The future of the hobby is dependent on the next generation.

Of course riding in an antique car is dangerous, this goes beyond children. If as an adult you can't be responsible for your own choices (seat belt laws) than your passengers are your liability for riding in an unsafe car. Personally I think riding in a smart car is dangerous. I think it is far more dangerous to tailgate than to ride in an antique car with a proficient driver.


Scott_Conger
Posts: 2459
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:18 am
First Name: Scott
Last Name: Conger
Location: Clark, WY
Board Member Since: 2005

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Scott_Conger » Thu Oct 31, 2019 10:23 pm

Chad

I'm not a lawyer...I simply have an average reading comprehension and the law in front of me.

regarding
The cops may be wrong but that doesn't stop them from pulling me over.
, you are absolutely right...there is a myriad of issues for which a stop can be made...depending on the part of the country, some are more legitimate than others. What I do know, is that police, like me, and you, are neither Legislators nor Lawyers and the patchwork of laws and exemptions within those laws makes their job pretty difficult at times.

If you really want to go 'round and 'round with an officer, try YOM tags on your car in some (legal) places. Many officers, particularly younger and non- car-savvy ones will absolutely without a doubt argue that you cannot register an old tag for your car. Here in WY, I have just discovered that if your car "did not come with a factory mounting arrangement on the front of the car" you don't have to display two tags out here. That came out in 2015 and I'll bet that not 1 in 10 officers will know that.

Sounds like you need to visit a lawyer/friend to understand the law better than us amatuers, and then carry a copy of the law with you...or quit driving kids around. If you do visit a lawyer, and he's worth his salt, he'll review the RCW (as mentioned earlier in a different post) and conclude that it clearly states that since you cannot strap your kids into something that doesn't exist, you don't have to strap them in, and that the fact that automobiles built prior to 1968 were not required to have restraints, you are bound to use only those safety devices the car originally came with (none). Many moms and dads will not be happy with that, and they (still) trump all. And if they do, then good for them...it is their right and responsibility to raise their children as they see fit.

I don't encourage any harmful or hazardous actions by anyone, but do wonder just how crowded New England would be if everyone off the boat had officials like our legislators around during westward migration and insisted all children be strapped to their Conestoga, or left home. No one would have made it past the Mowhawk Valley. I don't doubt that those parents loved their children, and yet embarked on a journey that was somewhat more hazardous than a trip to Tastee Freeze.

Isn't it ironic that the gov't ENTIRELY exempts itself from requiring children in their custody (school bus) to be buckled in? Roughly 17,000 children under the age of 19 visit emergency rooms each year for injuries associated with school buses.

There comes a point in a country's existence where when the citizens fear the gov't, there is....

Some would say we're there.
Last edited by Scott_Conger on Thu Oct 31, 2019 10:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Scott Conger

Full Flow Float Valves - deliver fuel like Henry intended!


Topic author
babychadwick
Posts: 164
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:03 am
First Name: Chad
Last Name: Azevedo
Location: Key Largo
Contact:

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by babychadwick » Thu Oct 31, 2019 10:47 pm

Governments should fear the people, people should not fear the govt. Or the difference between a citizen and a subject?

I have been given a warning for no brake lights (59 tbird). The officer said he did not see brake lights when I was stopped at the light. I asked him if he saw my brake lights come on when he pulled me over, he response was "yes, im giving you a written warning" I was pulled over in a '28 roadster for not having turn signals and informed all cars in FL must have signals. After a while in his car he came back and confirmed I was right and proceeded to do a safety inspection. I received a ticket for a boat I had at anchor for missing registration numbers (they were painted on) and another for no anchor light (at 1PM). Upon confronting in court the officer "couldn't remember the details" and dropped the charges. There are many more from friends of mine where we are given the chance investing our time and money to prove our innocence. I try not to make waves and ruffle any feathers with the locals.

Back on topic I was also stopped in the 59 tbird with my son in the front seat (no car seat seat belt) and told that I probably shouldn't have the window down and something to attach a car seat wouldn't be a bad idea. Considering he is in the front seat I would toss his seat in and thow a strap around the seat. Totally unsafe in the case of an accident. In the Zephyr I was approached by a cop (had out of date YOM plates still on as I was waiting for DMV to finish the plates, it was registered with the paper plate in the window) at school and the topic of registration and my son came up. He informed me that it was legal and that they had received 911 calls regarding it. My concern is this do gooder being part time volunteer firefighter might be able to make things harder than an average do gooder.


Scott_Conger
Posts: 2459
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:18 am
First Name: Scott
Last Name: Conger
Location: Clark, WY
Board Member Since: 2005

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Scott_Conger » Thu Oct 31, 2019 11:12 pm

My concern is this do gooder being part time volunteer firefighter might be able to make things harder than an average do gooder.
Frankly, I cannot imagine how, but you know him/her and we don't.
Scott Conger

Full Flow Float Valves - deliver fuel like Henry intended!


D Stroud
Posts: 772
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:45 am
First Name: David
Last Name: Stroud
Location: Mound City, MO 64470
Board Member Since: 2011

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by D Stroud » Fri Nov 01, 2019 6:41 am

Damn, I don't know how all of us kids survived back in the '50's/'70s riding in the back of pickups without seat belts, in the back of trucks hauling grain without seat belts, riding on top of a load of hay on a truck without seat belts, riding on tractors without seat belts, riding bicycles without helmets, riding behind a car(or truck) pulling an upside down car hood in the snow without seat belts, drag racing on a local highway(we never did it when there was any traffic), etc.,etc. We didn't need any Government or State regulations, we just used common sense. It seems like that is becoming a thing of the past. JMHO Dave
1925 mostly original coupe.

User avatar

Oldav8tor
Posts: 581
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:39 am
First Name: Tim
Last Name: Juhl
Location: Thumb of Michigan
MTFCA Number: 50297
MTFCI Number: 24810

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Oldav8tor » Fri Nov 01, 2019 10:57 am

In my opinion, common sense is not that common....at least not these days. One reason for all the safety devices is the "unexpected." Who leaves home planning to slip off the road and hit a tree? On our color tour last weekend we passed a modern car that did just that - hit it so hard the front end nearly wrapped around and touched. The teenaged driver was standing beside it trying to figure out how to explain it to his dad. Back in the days before crumple zones, seatbelts and airbags, he'd have probably gone thru the windshield and suffered life-threatening injuries. A few years back we had a case of grandpa letting his 5 year old grandson ride on the tractor with him while he mowed.... kid slipped and fell into a flail mower......

While I agree that in some cases the authorities have gone overboard, we must admit that we are at greater risk driving our T's than a modern car. We're adults, we accept the risk. Where kids are involved, we need to understand the risks and do what we can to mitigate them. That is my definition of "common sense."
1917 Touring
1946 Aeronca Champ
1952 Willys M38a1 Jeep
1953 Ford Jubilee Tractor

User avatar

Fordwright
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2019 4:14 pm
First Name: Greg
Last Name: Popove
Location: Olds AB

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by Fordwright » Fri Nov 01, 2019 12:22 pm

Considering the slower speeds, the limited amount of driving and the comparative lack of traffic congestion in the days of the Model T, the number of car accidents and related injuries was shockingly high.

http://www.observationsblog.com/odds-n- ... -the-1920s

User avatar

AndyClary
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:15 am
First Name: Andrew
Last Name: Clary
Location: Usa
MTFCA Number: 24057

Re: Am I right to be upset? Children in old cars

Post by AndyClary » Fri Nov 01, 2019 2:15 pm

Getting back to the original post, yes, you are right to be upset. Regardless of the opinion of whether or not to secure a child the author of the note approached the situation wrong. By using threatening wording he escalated a situation that did not previously exist. So, chalk it up to bad manners and move on.


Andy

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic