New T owner looking for some advice
Forum rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules
-
Topic author - Posts: 101
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2023 11:35 am
- First Name: Joshua
- Last Name: Ewing
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1918 Ford Model T Roadster, 1936 Ford Pickup (I know, not a T)
- Location: SW WA USA
- Contact:
Re: New T owner looking for some advice
Jerry,
The one I ordered is the “waterproof” version from Langs. I was told it’s plastic. I’m still curious about the soldering of the terminals to the bolts. I guess either way it’ll work.
skyhunter,
I would like one too but since they are no longer available, I plan to wire my own. It’s just a diode and a light bulb.
The one I ordered is the “waterproof” version from Langs. I was told it’s plastic. I’m still curious about the soldering of the terminals to the bolts. I guess either way it’ll work.
skyhunter,
I would like one too but since they are no longer available, I plan to wire my own. It’s just a diode and a light bulb.
-
- Posts: 6260
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:56 pm
- First Name: Frank
- Last Name: Brandi
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: Speedsters (1919 w 1926 upgrades), 1926 (Ricardo Head)
- Location: Moline IL
- Board Member Since: 2018
Re: New T owner looking for some advice
1918 is no-man's land for coil box styles (plus people change things overtime)- is the ignition switch on the box or the dash?JR Ewing wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2023 8:47 pmGot another question if you all don’t mind. I’ve decided to rebuild the coil box. The wood and contacts looked to be in decent shape but I pulled it out and found that the board had a decent bow to it. This is probably the reason the previous owner jammed so many wooden shims in between the box and coils. I ordered the full rebuild kit and I have been reading through previous posts discussing a coil box rebuild. I came across a post that talked about soldering the contacts to the carriage bolts. I understand the reasoning, but I am just wondering if this was done by Ford as well. I’m also wondering if there should be any concern of annealing the contacts. I doubt the bronze will get hot enough to do so, but just wanted to get some opinions on doing it this way. The box that was in my car did not have soldered contacts.
Other than that, I’m making progress. My coils and carburetor are out for rebuild. I have plenty of parts on the way to hopefully get this thing running. I’m still hoping to find some used tires just because new will stand out like a sore thumb on this vehicle, but I’ve still got plenty to do before I’ll need roadworthy tires on it anyways. Thanks!
If you ordered the wood rebuild kit you might be able to return it for the Waterproof kit plus the individual parts needed (like in the wood kit).
As another option you would need to waterproof the wood with a penetrating sealant. We all have our preferences - I use Minwax Wood Harndner. You'll see the first coat or two get sucked into the wood.
You do need to solder the wire to the bottom and the carriage bolt for voltage input. Soldering to the other carriage bolts has it pros & cons. While it gives a better contact it also helps spinning the bolt in the contact for those who over-tighten the nut over the porcelain & for those that didn't wrench hold that nut when tightening the nut over the wire. Con - need to just get a little solder over the cap of the bolt making sure that you don't get anything on the tongue of the contact to affect its spring
The wire the runs under the bottom plate fits into a groove. Originals had an strip of insulator over it, you can silicon fill it or waterproof tape it
The diagram is looking at the underside of the wood showing the wires.
The past is a great place and I don't want to erase it or to regret it, but I don't want to be its prisoner either.
Mick Jagger
Mick Jagger
-
Topic author - Posts: 101
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2023 11:35 am
- First Name: Joshua
- Last Name: Ewing
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1918 Ford Model T Roadster, 1936 Ford Pickup (I know, not a T)
- Location: SW WA USA
- Contact:
Re: New T owner looking for some advice
I did order the plastic kit, or at least what was advertised as the “waterproof” kit on Langs website. Over the phone I was told it is made from plastic. In addition to the plastic box panels, I ordered all the hardware and contacts for a complete rebuild. I did see that I’ll need to solder the wires to the terminal bolts. I just was unsure if the other bolts needed to be soldered to the new bronze contacts.
My coil box aligns with what came in 1918 models. It does have the switch on the face of the box. Thanks for the replies.
My coil box aligns with what came in 1918 models. It does have the switch on the face of the box. Thanks for the replies.
-
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 4:06 pm
- First Name: Jerry
- Last Name: Van
- Location: S.E. Michigan
Re: New T owner looking for some advice
If it has not been mentioned, if your original spring clips are still in good shape, then re-use them instead of using the new ones. Don't worry about the heat of soldering as long as you only heat just enough to flow the solder. If you use a torch, be certain it's a small one and apply heat to the bolt, not directly to the spring, while holding the solder in contact with the joint. Remove the heat the moment the solder flows. If you have a large soldering iron/gun that might be even better.
-
Topic author - Posts: 101
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2023 11:35 am
- First Name: Joshua
- Last Name: Ewing
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1918 Ford Model T Roadster, 1936 Ford Pickup (I know, not a T)
- Location: SW WA USA
- Contact:
Re: New T owner looking for some advice
Langs advertises their spring clips as “original factory quality bronze” and states they are the exact same shape and material as the factory ones. Is this incorrect?Jerry VanOoteghem wrote: ↑Wed Dec 06, 2023 3:03 pmIf it has not been mentioned, if your original spring clips are still in good shape, then re-use them instead of using the new ones. Don't worry about the heat of soldering as long as you only heat just enough to flow the solder. If you use a torch, be certain it's a small one and apply heat to the bolt, not directly to the spring, while holding the solder in contact with the joint. Remove the heat the moment the solder flows. If you have a large soldering iron/gun that might be even better.
I don’t know how to tell if the ones that came out of my car are original or not. The bottom one looks like it may have been replaced at some point. The individual spring clips are decent, but a couple are missing a finger.
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2022 10:50 pm
- First Name: Donncha
- Last Name: OapostropheMurchu
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1916 Speedster
- Location: Brookline, Mass
Re: New T owner looking for some advice
I don't even know how to spell diode.JR Ewing wrote: ↑Wed Dec 06, 2023 12:47 pmJerry,
The one I ordered is the “waterproof” version from Langs. I was told it’s plastic. I’m still curious about the soldering of the terminals to the bolts. I guess either way it’ll work.
skyhunter,
I would like one too but since they are no longer available, I plan to wire my own. It’s just a diode and a light bulb.
-
- Posts: 2433
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:55 pm
- First Name: James
- Last Name: Patrick
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926 Coupe
- Location: Bartow, FL
- Board Member Since: 2001
Re: New T owner looking for some advice
After 53 years of owning my 1926 coupe and, in that time, trying virtually every type of timer, I have come full circle and am now back to the original roller timer that came on my T. My T has always run the best using a roller type timer. Snyder’s (www.Snydersantiqueauto.com) has a great roller type timer I highly recommend. Part number T-3165. Jim Patrick
-
- Posts: 2245
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:39 am
- First Name: Tim
- Last Name: Juhl
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1917 Touring
- Location: Thumb of Michigan
- Board Member Since: 2018
Re: New T owner looking for some advice
Original coil box springs feel more rigid and have a square hole to accept the shoulder of the original bolts. The cheaper repops I've seen are noticeably softer and have a round hole that has to be modified a bit to get them to fit. I've used the cheap ones to double up with the originals to give them a little more strength. No problems due to poor contacts over the last few thousand miles.
1917 Touring
1946 Aeronca Champ
1952 Willys M38a1 Jeep (sold 2023)
1953 Ford Jubilee Tractor
1946 Aeronca Champ
1952 Willys M38a1 Jeep (sold 2023)
1953 Ford Jubilee Tractor
-
Topic author - Posts: 101
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2023 11:35 am
- First Name: Joshua
- Last Name: Ewing
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1918 Ford Model T Roadster, 1936 Ford Pickup (I know, not a T)
- Location: SW WA USA
- Contact:
Re: New T owner looking for some advice
The following is a description from Langs website. They claim they no longer sell the cheap ones that would lose spring tension. Also, these feature the square holes. Fingers crossed!
Langs Description:
The bronze metal chemistry and temper are exactly the same as originally supplied by Ford and the parts are carefully formed to the correct shape per Ford drawings to insure proper electrical contact with the coil unit side and bottom terminals.
Unlike other reproduction spring contacts being sold, these contacts will not fatigue and loose their springiness. These go on giving your coils very good electrical contact. (The other sets being sold do not have this ability and will allow the coils to lose contact as you travel down the road)
-Made exactly to Ford drawings
-Correct metal chemistry
-Correct metal tempering
-Correct metal forming
Langs Description:
The bronze metal chemistry and temper are exactly the same as originally supplied by Ford and the parts are carefully formed to the correct shape per Ford drawings to insure proper electrical contact with the coil unit side and bottom terminals.
Unlike other reproduction spring contacts being sold, these contacts will not fatigue and loose their springiness. These go on giving your coils very good electrical contact. (The other sets being sold do not have this ability and will allow the coils to lose contact as you travel down the road)
-Made exactly to Ford drawings
-Correct metal chemistry
-Correct metal tempering
-Correct metal forming
-
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 4:06 pm
- First Name: Jerry
- Last Name: Van
- Location: S.E. Michigan
Re: New T owner looking for some advice
Looks like a definite improvement! Good to see.JR Ewing wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2023 9:23 amThe following is a description from Langs website. They claim they no longer sell the cheap ones that would lose spring tension. Also, these feature the square holes. Fingers crossed!
Langs Description:
The bronze metal chemistry and temper are exactly the same as originally supplied by Ford and the parts are carefully formed to the correct shape per Ford drawings to insure proper electrical contact with the coil unit side and bottom terminals.
Unlike other reproduction spring contacts being sold, these contacts will not fatigue and loose their springiness. These go on giving your coils very good electrical contact. (The other sets being sold do not have this ability and will allow the coils to lose contact as you travel down the road)
-Made exactly to Ford drawings
-Correct metal chemistry
-Correct metal tempering
-Correct metal forming
-
Topic author - Posts: 101
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2023 11:35 am
- First Name: Joshua
- Last Name: Ewing
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1918 Ford Model T Roadster, 1936 Ford Pickup (I know, not a T)
- Location: SW WA USA
- Contact:
Re: New T owner looking for some advice
Only one way to find out.
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2022 10:50 pm
- First Name: Donncha
- Last Name: OapostropheMurchu
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1916 Speedster
- Location: Brookline, Mass
Re: New T owner looking for some advice
Good videoJR Ewing wrote: ↑Wed Dec 06, 2023 2:40 pmI did order the plastic kit, or at least what was advertised as the “waterproof” kit on Langs website. Over the phone I was told it is made from plastic. In addition to the plastic box panels, I ordered all the hardware and contacts for a complete rebuild. I did see that I’ll need to solder the wires to the terminal bolts. I just was unsure if the other bolts needed to be soldered to the new bronze contacts.
My coil box aligns with what came in 1918 models. It does have the switch on the face of the box. Thanks for the replies.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ejHesSttcs&lis ... _&index=10
-
Topic author - Posts: 101
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2023 11:35 am
- First Name: Joshua
- Last Name: Ewing
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1918 Ford Model T Roadster, 1936 Ford Pickup (I know, not a T)
- Location: SW WA USA
- Contact:
Re: New T owner looking for some advice
I did watch that video. I am just waiting for parts to arrive. It shouldn't be long before I see if this old automobile will run. I am surprised how intact this car is for 106 years old. It's a pretty honest car. Not much rust at all and only a couple old repairs. For now, I just plan to preserve the patina and get it road worthy. I will continue to update my progress if you all are interested.
-
- Posts: 2245
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:39 am
- First Name: Tim
- Last Name: Juhl
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1917 Touring
- Location: Thumb of Michigan
- Board Member Since: 2018
Re: New T owner looking for some advice
I don't know how I missed this but the contacts kit sold by Langs is supposed to be a match both physically and metallurgically to the originals, which Snyders is not. Looking at the photos they look correct. They cost more but in the long run I think they're worth it. PN 5001CONBQ
1917 Touring
1946 Aeronca Champ
1952 Willys M38a1 Jeep (sold 2023)
1953 Ford Jubilee Tractor
1946 Aeronca Champ
1952 Willys M38a1 Jeep (sold 2023)
1953 Ford Jubilee Tractor
-
Topic author - Posts: 101
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2023 11:35 am
- First Name: Joshua
- Last Name: Ewing
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1918 Ford Model T Roadster, 1936 Ford Pickup (I know, not a T)
- Location: SW WA USA
- Contact:
Re: New T owner looking for some advice
I will have them this week and will share my honest thoughts on quality.Oldav8tor wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 11:18 amI don't know how I missed this but the contacts kit sold by Langs is supposed to be a match both physically and metallurgically to the originals, which Snyders is not. Looking at the photos they look correct. They cost more but in the long run I think they're worth it. PN 5001CONBQ
-
- Posts: 3743
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:53 am
- First Name: Tim
- Last Name: Wrenn
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: '13 Touring, '26 "Overlap" Fordor
- Location: Ohio
- Board Member Since: 2019
Re: New T owner looking for some advice
I will always respect an individuals preference of "stuff" but again I have to say after trying just about all the different timers, for me at least, Tony Wiltshire's (RIP) has by far been the best, smoothest running and reliable of them all. I'm doing my best to keep his legacy going. Just finished a run of 41 of the rectangular brushes for many fellas, about to "call out" to see if there's enough need for at least another run of 12 of the round brush version.jiminbartow wrote: ↑Wed Dec 06, 2023 6:54 pmAfter 53 years of owning my 1926 coupe and, in that time, trying virtually every type of timer, I have come full circle and am now back to the original roller timer that came on my T. My T has always run the best using a roller type timer. Snyder’s (www.Snydersantiqueauto.com) has a great roller type timer I highly recommend. Part number T-3165. Jim Patrick
IMG_6512.jpeg
IMG_6513.jpeg
IMG_8279.jpeg
-
- Posts: 7237
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 9:37 pm
- First Name: Steve
- Last Name: Jelf
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1923 touring and a few projects
- Location: Parkerfield, Kansas
- Board Member Since: 2007
- Contact:
Re: New T owner looking for some advice
The inevitable often happens.
1915 Runabout
1923 Touring
1915 Runabout
1923 Touring
-
Topic author - Posts: 101
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2023 11:35 am
- First Name: Joshua
- Last Name: Ewing
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1918 Ford Model T Roadster, 1936 Ford Pickup (I know, not a T)
- Location: SW WA USA
- Contact:
Re: New T owner looking for some advice
Thanks Steve. I am new to Model Ts and your website has been very helpful for guys like me. Glad to see you’re back on the forum and on the road to recovery.Steve Jelf wrote: ↑Wed Dec 13, 2023 3:39 pmI want one of those!!
https://dauntlessgeezer.com/DG102.html
-
Topic author - Posts: 101
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2023 11:35 am
- First Name: Joshua
- Last Name: Ewing
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1918 Ford Model T Roadster, 1936 Ford Pickup (I know, not a T)
- Location: SW WA USA
- Contact:
Re: New T owner looking for some advice
I hope everyone had a Merry Christmas. I thought I should take a moment and post an update on my project that you all have been so helpful with.
Today I started the car for the first time since I became its owner. I’m not sure when the last time it ran was, but it ran so well, I decided to drive it, just around my property anyways. It runs and drives well. I have to make some adjustments here and there but it’s great to see it run and drive.
Thank you to all those who helped me get to this point.
Today I started the car for the first time since I became its owner. I’m not sure when the last time it ran was, but it ran so well, I decided to drive it, just around my property anyways. It runs and drives well. I have to make some adjustments here and there but it’s great to see it run and drive.
Thank you to all those who helped me get to this point.