Improved car rear bumpers

Discuss all things Model T related.
Forum rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules

Topic author
Arnie
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:32 am
First Name: Arnie
Last Name: Johansen
Location: USA

Improved car rear bumpers

Post by Arnie » Sun Dec 20, 2020 9:06 pm

I am told that the later improved runabouts and coupes came with split bumpers. In the book Model T Ford by Bruce McCalley on page 375 there is a fordor with bumpers front and rear. On page 376 there is a tudor with bumpers front and rear. On page 377 there is a coupe with bumpers front and rear. On page 378 there is a touring with bumpers front and rear. On page 379 there is a runabout with bumpers front and rear. Perhaps all these vehicles have two bars for the bumper going across the vehicle.

A letter dated Jan 7, 1926 from the Fargo branch indicated bumpers would be available on or about Feb 1, 1926. A letter dated March 15, 1926 from the Fargo Branch said "We expect to be in a position to furnish genuine Ford bumpers within the next 30 days". It gave part number T-3101R for the front bumper, T-3119R for the Fordor, Tudor and Touring rear bumper , and T-3120R for the rear bumper assembly for the coupe and runabout.

I do not know, but looking at the pictures in Bruce's book, would these be for the two face bar bumpers and not for any rear bumpers with a split or four face bars, two on each side of the spare tire on the coupe and runabout? Also, the above would indicate that bumpers were probably not available until after the 1926 model year was well into production. Does that mean early production 1926 vehicles did not come from the factory with bumpers?

With regard to the split bumpers on the rear of the coupes and runabouts, does anyone have a picture of the split rear bumpers on the runabouts and coupes. Also would one have the option of split or full across rear bumpers when and if the split bumper became available? Also what would be the part number of the split bumper assembly for the rear of the coupe and runabout? Was the split bumper available for 1926 and 1927 or only 1927 if it was ever available?

Thanks,

Arnie

User avatar

DanTreace
Posts: 3813
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:56 am
First Name: Dan
Last Name: Treace
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: ‘12 open express,'23 cutoff, '27 touring
Location: North Central FL
Board Member Since: 2000
Contact:

Re: Improved car rear bumpers

Post by DanTreace » Mon Dec 21, 2020 10:58 am

Arnie

Could be, haven't ever searched at the Benson Ford, and must admit haven't seen 'Ford' accessory split rear 'bumperettes' on a Model T. There were several mfg. of aftermarket rear bumperettes for the T, and those are still seen on T's today.

So can't add anything to this thread other than supporting documents by Bruce from his complete listing of Ford part numbers from his CD Encyl.

Those part numbers in the Letter from 'Fargo Branch' can't be found in his listings, but these are the rear bumper assembly numbers found in the Parts and Price Books, under Ford Specialties. In these listings only one 'bumper rail' or bar (3112SX) is listed, so only the one long length.


Image 12-21-20 at 10.29 AM.jpeg
Image 12-21-20 at 10.29 AM.jpeg (29.01 KiB) Viewed 4774 times

A further look at the complete listing in Bruce's CD super list, via alphabetical, does show a left and right rear bumper, BUT, this listing is from an Australian Part List, so maybe the bumperettes are an export item only?

Image 12-21-20 at 10.17 AM.jpeg
Image 12-21-20 at 10.17 AM.jpeg (79.56 KiB) Viewed 4774 times


Aftermarket rear bumperettes

IMG_3143 copy.jpg
IMG_3144.jpg
The best way is always the simplest. The attics of the world are cluttered up with complicated failures. Henry Ford
Don’t find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain. Henry Ford


Dropacent
Posts: 3384
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:39 am
First Name: Tim
Last Name: Morsher
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1925TT, 1926 Martin-Parry bodied wagon, 1927 mercury bodied speedster
Location: Norwalk Ohio

Re: Improved car rear bumpers

Post by Dropacent » Mon Dec 21, 2020 12:15 pm

I know parts numbers are listed, but I have never in my life seen a set of ford split rear bumpers. Had this conversation a bit ago with a friend who is putting original bumpers on his car.

User avatar

TWrenn
Posts: 3743
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:53 am
First Name: Tim
Last Name: Wrenn
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: '13 Touring, '26 "Overlap" Fordor
Location: Ohio
Board Member Since: 2019

Re: Improved car rear bumpers

Post by TWrenn » Mon Dec 21, 2020 2:53 pm

Does this help? They're on my '25/26 "overlap" Fordor.
Attachments
20201221_144939.jpg


Dropacent
Posts: 3384
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:39 am
First Name: Tim
Last Name: Morsher
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1925TT, 1926 Martin-Parry bodied wagon, 1927 mercury bodied speedster
Location: Norwalk Ohio

Re: Improved car rear bumpers

Post by Dropacent » Mon Dec 21, 2020 3:07 pm

I don’t believe those are ford factory, Timmy. They are beautiful, however

User avatar

TWrenn
Posts: 3743
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:53 am
First Name: Tim
Last Name: Wrenn
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: '13 Touring, '26 "Overlap" Fordor
Location: Ohio
Board Member Since: 2019

Re: Improved car rear bumpers

Post by TWrenn » Mon Dec 21, 2020 3:22 pm

Couldn't tell ya, but thought it wouldn't hurt to show 'em.
I like the rear bumpers, but frankly the front one can be a bit of a PIA sometimes.


GG Gregory
Posts: 326
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2019 3:05 pm
First Name: GG
Last Name: Gregory
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 27 Roadster
Location: Maryville Tn

Re: Improved car rear bumpers

Post by GG Gregory » Mon Dec 21, 2020 3:47 pm

I have the Marquette split style on my 27 Roadster.


Ken Buhler
Posts: 515
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 4:14 pm
First Name: Ken
Last Name: Buhler
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1927 Roadster 1927 Coupe
Location: Kelowna B.C.
Board Member Since: 2012

Re: Improved car rear bumpers

Post by Ken Buhler » Tue Dec 22, 2020 12:34 am

I bought a Canadian Roadster in 1982 that showed all indications of being unmolested/original. It is registered as a 1926, (not that - that proves year of production), Engine is #C681091. It came with wire wheels, nickel radiator shell, headlight crossbar, side curtain insert rings on the doors, and full bumpers on the front and split bumpers on the rear. The detail of stamping of the bumper braces is precise. I can provide detailed photos for anyone who would like.
Ken Buhler
Work honestly
Stay true to your word
Get the job done right


Topic author
Arnie
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:32 am
First Name: Arnie
Last Name: Johansen
Location: USA

Re: Improved car rear bumpers

Post by Arnie » Tue Dec 22, 2020 10:49 am

Ken:

Yes, if it is not to much trouble, please post some pictures of the rear split bumpers and the brackets and how they attach to the frame of the vehicle. Do you know if they are original, and have you seen other Model T Ford coupes/runabouts with the same configuration as you have?

Thanks, Dan for posting the information that perhaps split bumpers were used on vehicle produced in other countries.

Thanks,

Arnie


Jerry VanOoteghem
Posts: 4082
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 4:06 pm
First Name: Jerry
Last Name: Van
Location: S.E. Michigan

Re: Improved car rear bumpers

Post by Jerry VanOoteghem » Tue Dec 22, 2020 10:55 am

Ford supplied split bumbers, (bumperettes), for 26/27 Canadian cars.

I owned a pair that I sold a few years ago.


Dropacent
Posts: 3384
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:39 am
First Name: Tim
Last Name: Morsher
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1925TT, 1926 Martin-Parry bodied wagon, 1927 mercury bodied speedster
Location: Norwalk Ohio

Re: Improved car rear bumpers

Post by Dropacent » Tue Dec 22, 2020 11:20 am

Missing the cover but think this is a Canadian or export parts list.
Last edited by Dropacent on Tue Dec 22, 2020 11:58 am, edited 1 time in total.


Topic author
Arnie
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:32 am
First Name: Arnie
Last Name: Johansen
Location: USA

Re: Improved car rear bumpers

Post by Arnie » Tue Dec 22, 2020 11:49 am

Tim:
Thanks for providing that information. We learn something new everyday!

The picture with the bumperettes also appears to have a tail light/stop light that might be different than the one used in the United States!

Arnie


Dropacent
Posts: 3384
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:39 am
First Name: Tim
Last Name: Morsher
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1925TT, 1926 Martin-Parry bodied wagon, 1927 mercury bodied speedster
Location: Norwalk Ohio

Re: Improved car rear bumpers

Post by Dropacent » Tue Dec 22, 2020 12:00 pm

E112F4A2-7116-4384-B5F4-279E08C367D4.png


Russ_Furstnow
Posts: 370
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 9:01 am
First Name: Russ
Last Name: Furstnow
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1911 Torpedo,1913 Touring, 1914 Runabout, 1915 Coupelet, 1916 Coupelet, 1917 Coupelet
Location: Flagstaff, AZ
MTFCA Life Member: YES

Re: Improved car rear bumpers

Post by Russ_Furstnow » Wed Dec 23, 2020 12:56 pm

Here are the rear bumperettes on my 1927 Coupe. I love the look. Russ Furstnow
Attachments
100_1254.JPG
100_1256.JPG


Dropacent
Posts: 3384
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:39 am
First Name: Tim
Last Name: Morsher
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1925TT, 1926 Martin-Parry bodied wagon, 1927 mercury bodied speedster
Location: Norwalk Ohio

Re: Improved car rear bumpers

Post by Dropacent » Wed Dec 23, 2020 3:04 pm

By Jove, I think you’ve got it, Russ ! Thanks !

User avatar

henryford2
Posts: 811
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 4:14 pm
First Name: Joseph
Last Name: Andulics
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926 Fordor, 1926 Truck, 1927 Roadster GOW, RAJO Sprint car
Location: North Ridgeville, OH
Contact:

Re: Improved car rear bumpers

Post by henryford2 » Thu Dec 24, 2020 6:55 am

Parts book that Tim mentions in his post. Enjoy, stay safe.
Austrailian Parts Book 2.jpg
Australian Parts Book.jpg

User avatar

StevenS
Posts: 499
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:20 pm
First Name: Steven
Last Name: Sebaugh
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1924 Touring, 1924 TT Truck
Location: Jackson, Missouri

Re: Improved car rear bumpers

Post by StevenS » Thu Dec 24, 2020 3:29 pm

Here is a set I have, it looks like a Marquette brand. What year would these go on?


Bumper Model T 26-27 #1.jpg
Bumper Model T 26-27 #2.jpg
Bumper Model T 26-27 #3.jpg
Bumper Model T 26-27 #4.jpg
IMG_3143 copy.jpg
1924 Model T Touring
1924 Model TT Truck
1928 Graham-Paige model 619
1930 Model A Phaeton
"It is great to be crazy ... It gives you a lot more options in life"


Jerry VanOoteghem
Posts: 4082
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 4:06 pm
First Name: Jerry
Last Name: Van
Location: S.E. Michigan

Re: Improved car rear bumpers

Post by Jerry VanOoteghem » Fri Dec 25, 2020 9:21 am

StevenS wrote:
Thu Dec 24, 2020 3:29 pm
Here is a set I have, it looks like a Marquette brand. What year would these go on?



Bumper Model T 26-27 #1.jpg

Bumper Model T 26-27 #2.jpg

Bumper Model T 26-27 #3.jpg

Bumper Model T 26-27 #4.jpg

IMG_3143 copy.jpg
They would probably look appropriate on anything 1925ish or later. The front bumper looks like a genuine Ford bumper, but badly bent and with some add-on brackets at the ends.


Nathan Pederson
Posts: 136
Joined: Fri May 08, 2020 12:51 pm
First Name: Nathan
Last Name: Pederson
Location: MN

Re: Improved car rear bumpers

Post by Nathan Pederson » Sat Dec 26, 2020 6:17 pm

"Marquette" style split bumpers on a '26 Coupe:
Split Bumper.jpg


Ken Buhler
Posts: 515
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 4:14 pm
First Name: Ken
Last Name: Buhler
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1927 Roadster 1927 Coupe
Location: Kelowna B.C.
Board Member Since: 2012

Re: Improved car rear bumpers

Post by Ken Buhler » Sat Dec 26, 2020 10:57 pm

Sorry for the delay. These are the bumperettes I mentioned earlier.
More images in next message.
Attachments
IMG_3547.JPG
IMG_3548.JPG
IMG_3549.JPG
IMG_3550.JPG
IMG_3551.JPG
Work honestly
Stay true to your word
Get the job done right


Ken Buhler
Posts: 515
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 4:14 pm
First Name: Ken
Last Name: Buhler
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1927 Roadster 1927 Coupe
Location: Kelowna B.C.
Board Member Since: 2012

Re: Improved car rear bumpers

Post by Ken Buhler » Sat Dec 26, 2020 10:59 pm

Second part.
My front bumper braces are the same as the ones posted by Steven Sebaugh.
Attachments
IMG_3552.JPG
IMG_3553.JPG
Work honestly
Stay true to your word
Get the job done right


Topic author
Arnie
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:32 am
First Name: Arnie
Last Name: Johansen
Location: USA

Re: Improved car rear bumpers

Post by Arnie » Sun Dec 27, 2020 11:58 am

Ken:

Thanks for posting your rear bumpers and rear bumper brackets.

Do you know if the center part that clamps the both side bumpers together is original or not?

Can anyone comment on if the rear bumper brackets are the original Ford design. The reason I ask is that the original Ford front bumper brackets appear similar in the type of design or cross section.

Also can anyone comment on if split rear bumpers were sold by Ford for the 1926 or just the 1927 coupes and runabouts as an accessory? If Ford offered split rear bumpers would the single across the rear bumper(similar to the front bumper) still be offered by Ford for the coupes and runabouts?

Perhaps Donnie would know if split bumpers were only offered for what years and models of Model T Fords!


Dropacent
Posts: 3384
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:39 am
First Name: Tim
Last Name: Morsher
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1925TT, 1926 Martin-Parry bodied wagon, 1927 mercury bodied speedster
Location: Norwalk Ohio

Re: Improved car rear bumpers

Post by Dropacent » Sun Dec 27, 2020 12:16 pm

Great to see these detailed pictures, thanks for the efforts. I hesitate to use rare on anything model T, but I thinks these are in the rare category! If I still had the roadster, I would just have to have a set.

User avatar

DanTreace
Posts: 3813
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:56 am
First Name: Dan
Last Name: Treace
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: ‘12 open express,'23 cutoff, '27 touring
Location: North Central FL
Board Member Since: 2000
Contact:

Re: Improved car rear bumpers

Post by DanTreace » Sun Dec 27, 2020 1:13 pm

Agree, seeing accessory mfg. offering for the T bumpers is great! Likely only a few sets of those 'bumperettes' or fender guards exist today.

Here is another mfg type, made for many autos, but the Ford is also listed.



split bumperI .jpg
Ford USA never listed a part number for 'split' rear or bumperettes, so all seen are other make accessories. The Ford USA used only the full rear bars on all body styles. Here are some photos and Ford adv. too.


27 bumper.jpg
tudor .jpg
And a nice close up of the front bars, the nickel finish on the bars and on the bolt heads for the clamps, with the large clamps black and the center medallion nickel with black lettering.
ITouring front .jpg
The best way is always the simplest. The attics of the world are cluttered up with complicated failures. Henry Ford
Don’t find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain. Henry Ford


Ken Buhler
Posts: 515
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 4:14 pm
First Name: Ken
Last Name: Buhler
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1927 Roadster 1927 Coupe
Location: Kelowna B.C.
Board Member Since: 2012

Re: Improved car rear bumpers

Post by Ken Buhler » Sun Dec 27, 2020 3:19 pm

The frame was stamped for bumper mount bolts in production. I think all of my 26-27 frames are the same. It looks like the braces were made for both bumperettes or full face bars. The cross brace is correct for what I have. It is to stop the side swing/shake of the short ones that would not happen with full face bars.
Russ, do you have the cross brace? Is your coupe a Canadian car?
Work honestly
Stay true to your word
Get the job done right

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic