Given a slow revving, low compression engine like a model T, what difference would an extra .005" in the ring gap make. What may be the manifestations of this? In the past I was concerned with too tight clearance but thought little of a bit wider ring gap.
Allan from down under.
Another piston ring question.
Forum rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules
-
Allan
Topic author - Posts: 6609
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:21 pm
- First Name: Allan
- Last Name: Bennett
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1912 van, 1917 shooting brake, 1929 roadster buckboard, 1924 tourer, 1925 barn find buckboard, 1925 D &F wide body roadster, 1927LHD Tudor sedan.
- Location: Gawler, Australia
-
Kerry
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 2:42 pm
- First Name: Frank
- Last Name: van Ekeren
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1916 touring, 1916 pick-up, 1924 coupe, 1926 touring, 1927 touring
- Location: Rosedale Vic Australia
Re: Another piston ring question.
Allan, according to the Repco digest of Automotive engine re-conditioning, none, providing the .005" is above the minimum of the .003" per inch of bore and not over the max of .005" per inch of bore.