Given a slow revving, low compression engine like a model T, what difference would an extra .005" in the ring gap make. What may be the manifestations of this? In the past I was concerned with too tight clearance but thought little of a bit wider ring gap.
Allan from down under.
Another piston ring question.
Forum rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules
-
Allan
Topic author - Posts: 6609
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:21 pm
- First Name: Allan
- Last Name: Bennett
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1912 van, 1917 shooting brake, 1929 roadster buckboard, 1924 tourer, 1925 barn find buckboard, 1925 D &F wide body roadster, 1927LHD Tudor sedan.
- Location: Gawler, Australia
-
TXGOAT2
- Posts: 7391
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2021 10:08 pm
- First Name: Pat
- Last Name: McNallen
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926-7 roadster
- Location: Graham, Texas
- Board Member Since: 2021
Re: Another piston ring question.
If it performs well, I wouldn't worry about it. On a T, I'd be inclined to go toward the upper recommended limit for ring gap. T's with modern rings will have better oil control than the stock rings. Too much gap is too much, of course. Excess ring gap when new might lead to premature oil pumping or compression loss as rings seat and as they wear. Too much gap, whether from wear, tapered bore, or excess initial gap will promote blow by, which can interfere with lubrication and cause overheating of rings, especially at the gaps or anywhere a poor seal occurs. Too little gap can lead to serious issues right away. An engine that is expected to be run hard might benefit from a bit wider gaps and a careful, extended break in.
-
speedytinc
- Posts: 4725
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2021 12:24 pm
- First Name: john
- Last Name: karvaly
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 14/15 wide track roadster. 23 touring, 27 roadster pickup, 20ish rajo touring
- Location: orange, ca
- Board Member Since: 2020
Re: Another piston ring question.
To tight is bad. Can cause extra cylinder wear & ring breakage. Remember a T has no water jacket around the cylinders. A little extra clearance over the tightest manufactures standard recommended clearance is in order, IMO.
A fellow motor builder described extra clearance as not so critical. Its like trying to throw a bucket full of water thru a key hole.
That being said, I set piston clearance @ .0045-.005. This makes for a wider ring gap with standard ring sets, so I fit .010 over bore rings to stay out of the excessive ring gap range. My memory says .016" - 018" which I dont rely on, so I check the recommended gaps according to a motors manual recommendation for 292 Y-blocks. Top ring should have the most clearance due to running hotter.
A fellow motor builder described extra clearance as not so critical. Its like trying to throw a bucket full of water thru a key hole.
That being said, I set piston clearance @ .0045-.005. This makes for a wider ring gap with standard ring sets, so I fit .010 over bore rings to stay out of the excessive ring gap range. My memory says .016" - 018" which I dont rely on, so I check the recommended gaps according to a motors manual recommendation for 292 Y-blocks. Top ring should have the most clearance due to running hotter.