improvements

Discuss all things Model T related.
Forum rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules

Topic author
ryanpad
Posts: 103
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2023 1:49 pm
First Name: Vincent
Last Name: Ryan
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1913 TOURING CONVERSION
Location: El Cajon
Board Member Since: 2023

improvements

Post by ryanpad » Fri Mar 22, 2024 2:14 pm

Do lighter aluminum pistons significantly reduce vibration?

User avatar

Humblej
Posts: 1957
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 12:23 pm
First Name: Jeff
Last Name: Humble
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926 Canadian coupe, 1924 TT C-cab, 1924 runabout
Location: Charlevoix, Mi
Board Member Since: 2006

Re: improvements

Post by Humblej » Fri Mar 22, 2024 3:22 pm

No, not in my experience.


RVA23T
Posts: 834
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2022 8:27 am
First Name: Richard
Last Name: C
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1923 Touring
Location: Lake Country, Virginia

Re: improvements

Post by RVA23T » Fri Mar 22, 2024 3:51 pm

Is a counter balanced crankshaft the answer?
Everything works in theory.
Reality is how you determine if something works or not.

User avatar

Mark Nunn
Posts: 1241
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:01 am
First Name: Mark
Last Name: Nunn
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926 Runabout
Location: Bennington, NE
Board Member Since: 2017

Re: improvements

Post by Mark Nunn » Fri Mar 22, 2024 4:00 pm

Weighing and balancing pistons and rods would probably have a greater effect on reducing vibration. This assumes that your other rotating engine components are balanced too. My T runs fine with cast iron pistons. Contrary to current automotive wisdom, my modern has a 2L 4-cylinder engine with an aluminum block and steel pistons. That seems backwards to me, but it runs really smooth.


Topic author
ryanpad
Posts: 103
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2023 1:49 pm
First Name: Vincent
Last Name: Ryan
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1913 TOURING CONVERSION
Location: El Cajon
Board Member Since: 2023

Re: improvements

Post by ryanpad » Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:01 pm

I guess the only improvement I’ll do going back up is the one piece valves.


tdump
Posts: 1404
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:00 pm
First Name: Mack
Last Name: Cole
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: TT. T express pickup,speedster project.
Location: North Carolina

Re: improvements

Post by tdump » Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:06 pm

ryanpad wrote:
Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:01 pm
I guess the only improvement I’ll do going back up is the one piece valves.
They built over 15 million model T Fords with cast iron pistons and etc.
Most ran until they were worn out 4 times over being stock or repaired with what was around at the time.
Build your engine to the best you can afford to do and have fun with the T.
If you can't help em, don't hinder em'


Allan
Posts: 6609
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:21 pm
First Name: Allan
Last Name: Bennett
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1912 van, 1917 shooting brake, 1929 roadster buckboard, 1924 tourer, 1925 barn find buckboard, 1925 D &F wide body roadster, 1927LHD Tudor sedan.
Location: Gawler, Australia

Re: improvements

Post by Allan » Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:27 pm

A simple answer is maybe. It may even be noticeable. The new alloy pistons are very well matched in weight, so that's a good start. They are much lighter than the old cast iron items, so that would help too. But you may still not notice any difference, especially at normal T speeds.

The difference becomes more noticeable when you fit a counterbalanced crankshaft, balance the rods, flywheel assembly, transmission drums etc.

Allan from down under.

User avatar

Jugster
Posts: 181
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 6:41 pm
First Name: Bob
Last Name: Coiro
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1915 Touring
Location: Commack, NY
Board Member Since: 2009

Re: improvements

Post by Jugster » Fri Mar 22, 2024 10:26 pm

I'm going to refer to the late Harold Sharon (the brass-car guru and engineer who wrote "Understanding Your Brass Car"). His position was that the ideal weight for reciprocating parts is zero. Of course, that's not possible, but the closer you can come to that number, the better for vibration, wear and all-around efficiency. That does make sense, but the more we depart from the original design and materials, the further we get from the antique-car experience. The reason we drive these cars is to go back in time and experience what it was like back in the day. My car has aluminum pistons, a high-compression head, a high-volume intake manifold, an NH carburetor and a flat-tube radiator. It's a great touring machine, the engine runs nice and smooth and has very good power (for a Model T), but sometimes I wonder whether I've made too many compromises with the historicity of the car.


TXGOAT2
Posts: 7391
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2021 10:08 pm
First Name: Pat
Last Name: McNallen
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926-7 roadster
Location: Graham, Texas
Board Member Since: 2021

Re: improvements

Post by TXGOAT2 » Sat Mar 23, 2024 10:56 am

Well-designed aluminum pistons that are properly fitted make a substantial improvement in performance. Lighter weight gives lower bearing and connecting rod inertia loading and quicker acceleration. Modern design pistons and rings give far better durability and oil control with less blow-by than original designs. Aluminum pistons allow an engine to run at somewhat higher RPM without loss of durability. Aluminum pistons together with a counter balanced crankshaft, one piece valves, a good cam, and a good auxiliary oiler make for a much smoother and more durable engine than the original equipment while providing more usable horsepower, better fuel and oil economy, and will allow for better hill climbing and higher sustained road speeds.


TXGOAT2
Posts: 7391
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2021 10:08 pm
First Name: Pat
Last Name: McNallen
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926-7 roadster
Location: Graham, Texas
Board Member Since: 2021

Re: improvements

Post by TXGOAT2 » Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:06 am

Improvements aimed at increasing performance are best reserved for later model cars, particularly the 1925 and later cars.
However, significantly reducing engine vibration can benefit earlier cars by reducing wear and stress on the entire car in the case of earlier cars that are driven extensively.
Very early cars are lighter than the later ones and had more power to begin with, besides being a lot rarer.
With a very early car, I would strive for originality over performance.


Norman Kling
Posts: 4634
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 1:39 pm
First Name: Norman
Last Name: Kling
Location: Alpine California

Re: improvements

Post by Norman Kling » Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:31 am

One thing not mentioned is that Aluminum expands more than iron. For that reason if the engine overheats it can cause the engine to seize. This can score the cylinder walls. Norm


TXGOAT2
Posts: 7391
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2021 10:08 pm
First Name: Pat
Last Name: McNallen
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926-7 roadster
Location: Graham, Texas
Board Member Since: 2021

Re: improvements

Post by TXGOAT2 » Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:43 am

Correct running fit is essential with any type piston, and aluminum pistons likely would need to be fitted with more cold clearance than cast iron ones. As for scoring, a cast iron piston would probably do more damage than an aluminum one would in that situation. Quality modern aluminum pistons have very good expansion control as well as excellent oil control. I'd want to use them in any engine that I expected to put road miles on. Exceptions would be a very early car or an extremely low miles later one with original internal engine parts in good condition.


ModelTWoods
Posts: 1418
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 10:53 am
First Name: Terry
Last Name: Woods
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1927 Model T coupe, 1926 4 door sedan
Location: Cibolo (San Antonio), TX

Re: improvements

Post by ModelTWoods » Sat Mar 23, 2024 3:56 pm

ryanpad wrote:
Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:01 pm
I guess the only improvement I’ll do going back up is the one piece valves.
[/quote
Vince, if you don't have a way to accurately check the balance of your T crankshaft and flywheel/transmission assembly, at least weigh your rods and pistons and match them in weight. I've read Ford did not do this at the factory, but instead weighed them and just matched four sets together, as close to the same weight as possible. If the rods and pistons are weighed separately, it is relatively easy to remove a little weight here and there to make them match in weight.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic