Road & Track Dyno results

Discuss all things Model T related.
Forum rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules

Topic author
Moxie26
Posts: 1863
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:20 pm
First Name: Robert
Last Name: Jablonski
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926 Runabout
Location: New Jersey
MTFCA Life Member: YES
Board Member Since: 1999

Road & Track Dyno results

Post by Moxie26 » Wed Dec 20, 2023 5:50 pm


User avatar

TMiller6
Posts: 278
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:11 pm
First Name: Thomas
Last Name: Miller
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 16, 24, 26 Touring - 26 Roadster and Fordor
Location: SE MI
Board Member Since: 2006

Re: Road & Track Dyno results

Post by TMiller6 » Thu Dec 21, 2023 12:24 pm

I watched it around the 35 minute mark. No surprises about the ‘15. As a kid, I remember R&T doing an article about a straight six Mustang and how much power actually met the road.

I couldn’t tell for sure if he was cranking the car safely. I also question the safety of spinning up the 4 blade fan with no hood. He also is missing a screw on his windshield hinge.
Tom Miller
One who cannot find beauty in an engine cannot find beauty in the universe.

User avatar

Jeff5015
Posts: 178
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2019 3:20 pm
First Name: Jeff
Last Name: Schroeder
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1916 Touring
Location: Pensacola FL
Board Member Since: 2019

Re: Road & Track Dyno results

Post by Jeff5015 » Fri Dec 22, 2023 9:14 am

Excellent article and video.
1916 Touring


Been Here Before
Posts: 654
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2019 2:00 pm
First Name: George John
Last Name: Drobnock
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1922 Coupe
Location: Central Pennsylvania

Re: Road & Track Dyno results

Post by Been Here Before » Fri Dec 22, 2023 9:28 am

So what did the RT test prove of a 100 year old plus car in the 21st century using modern fuel?

The test would be more interesting if a 1915 gasoline mix was used compared to a 21st century blend.

The test would be interesting is 1915 oil was in the crank case.

So what did the test prove?

A better test the 1915 car against the "Improved 1927."


Art M
Posts: 964
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2019 12:57 pm
First Name: Art
Last Name: Mirtes
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1923 Touring
Location: Huron, Ohio
Board Member Since: 2016

Re: Road & Track Dyno results

Post by Art M » Fri Dec 22, 2023 9:54 pm

When I was attending school in the early 60s, the school had a wheels on rollers type dynamometer. It was rated to 300 horsepower. At this time no one ever expected a standard production car to exceed 300 HP at the rear wheels. They allowed the students to check their car's power.

One day a student showed up with a 1963 Chevy with a 409 ci. engine. It maxed out the machine. Shortly after that the GTOs and etc did the same thing.

Art Mirtes


TXGOAT2
Posts: 7391
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2021 10:08 pm
First Name: Pat
Last Name: McNallen
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926-7 roadster
Location: Graham, Texas
Board Member Since: 2021

Re: Road & Track Dyno results

Post by TXGOAT2 » Fri Dec 22, 2023 10:33 pm

A friend got his grandmother's '58 four door Bel Aire with a 348 and a powerglide. He put a 3 -2bbl intake, cam, cast iron headers, and a 4-speed in it, and a 2 track tape player. Lotta fun. Safe? Uhh, no. Grandma got a new 1966 maroon Malibu 4 door with a V8 & automatic.


John Codman
Posts: 1481
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:27 am
First Name: John
Last Name: Codman
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1927 Youring
Location: Naples, FL 34120

Re: Road & Track Dyno results

Post by John Codman » Sat Dec 23, 2023 11:01 am

Some of the 348 Chevys came stock with 3 2BBL carburetors.


TXGOAT2
Posts: 7391
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2021 10:08 pm
First Name: Pat
Last Name: McNallen
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926-7 roadster
Location: Graham, Texas
Board Member Since: 2021

Re: Road & Track Dyno results

Post by TXGOAT2 » Sat Dec 23, 2023 5:12 pm

He had a genuine Chevy cast iron setup. I think it had a vacuum arrangement, which was replaced with a mechanical progressive linkage. It worked very well.


Dave Young
Posts: 235
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2019 9:37 pm
First Name: David
Last Name: Young
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 26 Touring, 26 RPU, 24 Coupe, 26 Speedster, 28 Chandler, 29 Chandler, 29 A
Location: Mays Landing, Nj

Re: Road & Track Dyno results

Post by Dave Young » Sat Dec 23, 2023 5:49 pm

That was a neat watch, Bob.


AndyClary
Posts: 835
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:15 am
First Name: Andrew
Last Name: Clary
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1914 Runabout 1926 Coupe. Mercury Speedster #1249
Location: Usa

Re: Road & Track Dyno results

Post by AndyClary » Sun Dec 24, 2023 10:25 am

The last tour in Kanab (2012?) there was a dyno setup. I thought it was Kevin Prus but I could be wrong. I couldn’t find the article with the results but out of 20 or so tests there were quite a few under 20 HP. Keep in mind it was an MTFCI tour and there were more stock vehicles than at a MTFCA tour. Highest HP was Don Houseman’s Rajo powered speedster at just over 50. I didn’t Dino my speedster because I didn’t want to be disappointed.

Andy


TXGOAT2
Posts: 7391
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2021 10:08 pm
First Name: Pat
Last Name: McNallen
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926-7 roadster
Location: Graham, Texas
Board Member Since: 2021

Re: Road & Track Dyno results

Post by TXGOAT2 » Sun Dec 24, 2023 10:57 am

Drivelines eat power.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic