Road & Track Dyno results
Forum rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:11 pm
- First Name: Thomas
- Last Name: Miller
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 16, 24, 26 Touring - 26 Roadster and Fordor
- Location: SE MI
- Board Member Since: 2006
Re: Road & Track Dyno results
I watched it around the 35 minute mark. No surprises about the ‘15. As a kid, I remember R&T doing an article about a straight six Mustang and how much power actually met the road.
I couldn’t tell for sure if he was cranking the car safely. I also question the safety of spinning up the 4 blade fan with no hood. He also is missing a screw on his windshield hinge.
I couldn’t tell for sure if he was cranking the car safely. I also question the safety of spinning up the 4 blade fan with no hood. He also is missing a screw on his windshield hinge.
Tom Miller
One who cannot find beauty in an engine cannot find beauty in the universe.
One who cannot find beauty in an engine cannot find beauty in the universe.
-
- Posts: 654
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2019 2:00 pm
- First Name: George John
- Last Name: Drobnock
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1922 Coupe
- Location: Central Pennsylvania
Re: Road & Track Dyno results
So what did the RT test prove of a 100 year old plus car in the 21st century using modern fuel?
The test would be more interesting if a 1915 gasoline mix was used compared to a 21st century blend.
The test would be interesting is 1915 oil was in the crank case.
So what did the test prove?
A better test the 1915 car against the "Improved 1927."
The test would be more interesting if a 1915 gasoline mix was used compared to a 21st century blend.
The test would be interesting is 1915 oil was in the crank case.
So what did the test prove?
A better test the 1915 car against the "Improved 1927."
-
- Posts: 964
- Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2019 12:57 pm
- First Name: Art
- Last Name: Mirtes
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1923 Touring
- Location: Huron, Ohio
- Board Member Since: 2016
Re: Road & Track Dyno results
When I was attending school in the early 60s, the school had a wheels on rollers type dynamometer. It was rated to 300 horsepower. At this time no one ever expected a standard production car to exceed 300 HP at the rear wheels. They allowed the students to check their car's power.
One day a student showed up with a 1963 Chevy with a 409 ci. engine. It maxed out the machine. Shortly after that the GTOs and etc did the same thing.
Art Mirtes
One day a student showed up with a 1963 Chevy with a 409 ci. engine. It maxed out the machine. Shortly after that the GTOs and etc did the same thing.
Art Mirtes
-
- Posts: 7391
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2021 10:08 pm
- First Name: Pat
- Last Name: McNallen
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926-7 roadster
- Location: Graham, Texas
- Board Member Since: 2021
Re: Road & Track Dyno results
A friend got his grandmother's '58 four door Bel Aire with a 348 and a powerglide. He put a 3 -2bbl intake, cam, cast iron headers, and a 4-speed in it, and a 2 track tape player. Lotta fun. Safe? Uhh, no. Grandma got a new 1966 maroon Malibu 4 door with a V8 & automatic.
-
- Posts: 1481
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:27 am
- First Name: John
- Last Name: Codman
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1927 Youring
- Location: Naples, FL 34120
Re: Road & Track Dyno results
Some of the 348 Chevys came stock with 3 2BBL carburetors.
-
- Posts: 7391
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2021 10:08 pm
- First Name: Pat
- Last Name: McNallen
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926-7 roadster
- Location: Graham, Texas
- Board Member Since: 2021
Re: Road & Track Dyno results
He had a genuine Chevy cast iron setup. I think it had a vacuum arrangement, which was replaced with a mechanical progressive linkage. It worked very well.
-
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2019 9:37 pm
- First Name: David
- Last Name: Young
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 26 Touring, 26 RPU, 24 Coupe, 26 Speedster, 28 Chandler, 29 Chandler, 29 A
- Location: Mays Landing, Nj
Re: Road & Track Dyno results
That was a neat watch, Bob.
-
- Posts: 835
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:15 am
- First Name: Andrew
- Last Name: Clary
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1914 Runabout 1926 Coupe. Mercury Speedster #1249
- Location: Usa
Re: Road & Track Dyno results
The last tour in Kanab (2012?) there was a dyno setup. I thought it was Kevin Prus but I could be wrong. I couldn’t find the article with the results but out of 20 or so tests there were quite a few under 20 HP. Keep in mind it was an MTFCI tour and there were more stock vehicles than at a MTFCA tour. Highest HP was Don Houseman’s Rajo powered speedster at just over 50. I didn’t Dino my speedster because I didn’t want to be disappointed.
Andy
Andy
-
- Posts: 7391
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2021 10:08 pm
- First Name: Pat
- Last Name: McNallen
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926-7 roadster
- Location: Graham, Texas
- Board Member Since: 2021
Re: Road & Track Dyno results
Drivelines eat power.