Wow, thanks for all the input everyone!
Thomas, Frank, Jim, I agree it
looks like a chair, but it seems to be floating in space - which does make it look a little incongruent to the rest of the photo. I think at this stage it's not likely to add much more to solving the puzzle? Unless perhaps someone could ID it as local to a region - or could it be a particular services (eg Army) item?
Jim, yes a cigarette case I think, Frank seems to have found out some good information on that (I need a thumbs up icon).
George, great to hear it looks like it could be Ft Benning, thank you. Is there a particular area there that you think it could be from?
Steve & John, appreciate the info, thanks. That was my initial thought but I'm constantly amazed at the detail that people seem to pick up on out of a picture - I expect you noticed it too but it seems to me the steering wheel is on front to back. Perhaps that was the then equivalent of today's 'sports wheel', but I guess by the time the picture was taken the car would have been ~19 years old so the wheel could have been on and off a few times.
Susanne, good spotting on the person, but I'm just not completely sure it is someone!? It's very difficult to tell because it also looks to be centre of the foliage around that could make it the trunk of a tree. I've zoomed in on it numerous times and just haven't been able to reach a conclusion. Unfortunately the original photo (which is what this image is directly from) isn't really any clearer.
Yes, it's certainly something man-made to the right and upper; a 'chow-hall' sounds interesting and I guess could fit in with George's thoughts on location. The 'chair' continues to be a puzzle, I don't think the angles are right for it to be hanging from the tree?
Jim, I don't think it's a lake - it looks to be too high for that? My take on it is that there's a road/track behind the car that leads from right to left of the picture, and I suspect the car was turned left off that track. Given the 'whiteout' condition (which perhaps makes it a look a little lake-like) I wondered if it could be early morning, with a mist of some sort clinging to the ground? There's not much shadow angle visible so it's possibly taken at either end of the day, or mid-day, the mist theory would fit in with early morning (and mist could disperse any sunlight). Incidentally you're already looking at what some 'amazing software' has done

Unfortunately in this case the image I got was fairly much as good as the original so there wasn't a lot one could do with it to further enhance. It did however show up the watermark on the back of the photograph from which I was able to ID the paper - this wasn't especially visible to the native eye.
Frank, that's a jackpot on the case I think - well done! If it's english-made then I guess it could have been given to Karol from another member of his regiment and may even not be (directly) related to the photograph, unless they were available in the U.S. at the time? It's curious that his initials are perfectly engraved on the front, but the internal inscription is somewhat amateurly done. I suppose it's possible the initials could have been done at a later time - quite probably at the time Karol received the case there was no certainty of life beyond the next short while and there was no time for such delicate work.
I agree re the paper, it looks as if you found the same site I did when I researched it. There was some interesting associated data on photographers stamps but the impression I got was that the stamps were more distinctive (ie. sufficient to identify the photographer) than what this appears to be. The 'H9' looks to be stamped, so could be a group number, or paper batch number of some sort (?), the '7' is written so perhaps the developer put that in for some reason - with any luck your Kodak historian might be able to help out with this.
Randy - if it was then it didn't work very well!
Jim, you're right regarding the season I think, it was my thought too. I looked to see when you'd expect leaves to fall and be so thick in the U.S. southern states and from what I could make out it seemed to me you might see something like this very late in the year? Is this correct? If so then the photo could well be late 1944, fitting in with the assumption that he went for training prior to the end of WW2, although I suppose it's always possible it could be a year later - unfortunately Steve's unaware of anything more that could pinpoint this (although he's asked for his father's service records, which are taking some time to arrive).
Anyway once again thanks for your thoughts and input - I'll call Steve shortly and let him know what you've come up
