Original Crank Diameter
Forum rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules
-
Topic author - Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 10:15 pm
- First Name: Paul
- Last Name: Allen
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1923
- Location: California
- Board Member Since: 2016
Original Crank Diameter
What is the original shaft diameter of the crank at the pulley? I understand that there were 2 sizes of cranks.
Thank you
Thank you
-
- Posts: 1697
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2019 9:28 am
- First Name: ROBERT
- Last Name: BERGSTADT
- Location: LOVES PARK IL
Re: Original Crank Diameter
1.248 IS STANDARD, Bob
-
Topic author - Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 10:15 pm
- First Name: Paul
- Last Name: Allen
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1923
- Location: California
- Board Member Since: 2016
Re: Original Crank Diameter
Thank you Bob,
do you know if there were 2 sizes of cranks?
do you know if there were 2 sizes of cranks?
-
- Posts: 1697
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2019 9:28 am
- First Name: ROBERT
- Last Name: BERGSTADT
- Location: LOVES PARK IL
Re: Original Crank Diameter
only one size I know of, Bob
-
- Posts: 7238
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 9:37 pm
- First Name: Steve
- Last Name: Jelf
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1923 touring and a few projects
- Location: Parkerfield, Kansas
- Board Member Since: 2007
- Contact:
Re: Original Crank Diameter
The Ford parts book shows just one crankshaft (#3030) for all years. There were changes in materials, but not in measurements.
The inevitable often happens.
1915 Runabout
1923 Touring
1915 Runabout
1923 Touring
-
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 2:42 pm
- First Name: Frank
- Last Name: van Ekeren
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1916 touring, 1916 pick-up, 1924 coupe, 1926 touring, 1927 touring
- Location: Rosedale Vic Australia
Re: Original Crank Diameter
The way I read the question is the diameter of the crank at the pulley, so 1.248 is not correct, that's the journal size. The gear presses
on to the shoulder of the front main journal so the pulley diameter of the crank shaft is smaller.
on to the shoulder of the front main journal so the pulley diameter of the crank shaft is smaller.
-
- Posts: 655
- Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2020 1:41 pm
- First Name: Kevin
- Last Name: Matthiesen
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 26 T Coupe, 16 T Open Express, 21 TT Flatbed. 15 T Roadster, 13 & 25 T Speedster’s,51 Mercury 4 door sport sedan, 67 Mercury Cougar
- Location: Madera CA 93636
Re: Original Crank Diameter
There may be a misunderstanding on the crankshaft front pulley area. The crankshaft diameter is the same all years. It is the pulley, at the fan belt diameter, that changed. The small pulley for the narrow nose pan but used in early wide nose pans into around 1919 and the large pulley for the wide nose pan but started use around 1919.
-
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 4:06 pm
- First Name: Jerry
- Last Name: Van
- Location: S.E. Michigan
Re: Original Crank Diameter
Yes, but the diameter of hole in the pulley did not change. Besides, the OP didn't ask about pulleys, he asked about the crankshaft diameter where the pulley goes.kmatt2 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 3:19 pmThere may be a misunderstanding on the crankshaft front pulley area. The crankshaft diameter is the same all years. It is the pulley, at the fan belt diameter, that changed. The small pulley for the narrow nose pan but used in early wide nose pans into around 1919 and the large pulley for the wide nose pan but started use around 1919.
I believe that Kerry is correct. The diameter in question would be less than the front main journal diameter.
-
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:19 am
- First Name: Trent
- Last Name: Boggess
- Location: New Hampshire
Re: Original Crank Diameter
Contrary to what has been said above, not all Model Ts used the same crankshaft.
The first 2500 Model T’s used a gear driven water pump and fan, so there was no pulley at the front of the crankshaft. Additionally, the starting crank ratchet on these cars was a different design, and the front of the crankshaft was machined smaller in diameter than the crankshafts used on post-2500 cars.
Respectfully submitted,
Trent Boggess
The first 2500 Model T’s used a gear driven water pump and fan, so there was no pulley at the front of the crankshaft. Additionally, the starting crank ratchet on these cars was a different design, and the front of the crankshaft was machined smaller in diameter than the crankshafts used on post-2500 cars.
Respectfully submitted,
Trent Boggess
-
- Posts: 5174
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 12:18 pm
- First Name: Steve
- Last Name: Tomaso
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1914 Touring, 1919 Centerdoor, 1924 TT C-Cab Express, 1925 Racer
- Location: Longbranch, WA
- Board Member Since: 2001
Re: Original Crank Diameter
I just measured over a dozen - nothing in the '09 era but diamond web & AA & EE cranks are approx. 1.1855 in the pulley area.
-
- Posts: 655
- Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2020 1:41 pm
- First Name: Kevin
- Last Name: Matthiesen
- * REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 26 T Coupe, 16 T Open Express, 21 TT Flatbed. 15 T Roadster, 13 & 25 T Speedster’s,51 Mercury 4 door sport sedan, 67 Mercury Cougar
- Location: Madera CA 93636
Re: Original Crank Diameter
Jerry, I did say that the crankshaft diameter at the pulley was the same for all years. I did not consider the early waterpump cars. The pulley at the fan belt information was given for general information to all readers, some of who are new to the Model T. Sometimes things get lost in word of mouth over the years.