connecting rod size
Forum rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules
-
Topic author - Posts: 96
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 1:58 am
- First Name: John
- Last Name: bevardos
- Location: Los Angeles
connecting rod size
Hi guys ,
my basic math has left me ----- I have a crank that was ground .005 undersize and my connecting rod choices are either std or .010.
Should I use the std size rods and take shims away or should I scrape the .010 down? Btw--its to replace existing rods in the engine already .
Thank you
John
my basic math has left me ----- I have a crank that was ground .005 undersize and my connecting rod choices are either std or .010.
Should I use the std size rods and take shims away or should I scrape the .010 down? Btw--its to replace existing rods in the engine already .
Thank you
John
-
- Posts: 853
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:57 am
- First Name: Adam
- Last Name: Doleshal
- Location: Wisconsin
- MTFCA Number: 23809
- MTFCI Number: 1
- Board Member Since: 2000
Re: connecting rod size
Scrape the .010” rods is your best bet for a tight clearance.
Standards will be your easiest option, but will end up with wider side clearances. If you go with standards and remove shims, you will have your target clearance top and bottom, but .005” over that on the sides.
Standards will be your easiest option, but will end up with wider side clearances. If you go with standards and remove shims, you will have your target clearance top and bottom, but .005” over that on the sides.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 12:30 pm
- First Name: Mike
- Last Name: Bender
- Location: Tulsa OK
- MTFCA Number: 21160
Re: connecting rod size
Why not have a set of rods poured and cut to your size. They are a number of companies that can provide you that service for the same price as a standard or .010" under rod.
-
- Posts: 2805
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:18 am
- First Name: Scott
- Last Name: Conger
- Location: Clark, WY
- Board Member Since: 2005
Re: connecting rod size
Mike gives good advice. This is exactly what I did and am happy I did. Don't fool with trying to tell THEM what you need by calculating the size...just measure your journals, and if they are round and straight, tell them the size and they will bore them to be the correct fit from the get-go. Like Mike says, there are several folks to go to and if you'd like a recommendation, email me.
Scott Conger
Full Flow Float Valves - deliver fuel like Henry intended!
Full Flow Float Valves - deliver fuel like Henry intended!
-
- Posts: 485
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:08 am
- First Name: DAN
- Last Name: MCEACHERN
- Location: ALAMEDA,CA,USA
Re: connecting rod size
John- I replied to your other thread regarding rods and never heard from you.
Dan
Dan
-
Topic author - Posts: 96
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 1:58 am
- First Name: John
- Last Name: bevardos
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: connecting rod size
Guys, thank you for all the replies. Dan, PM sent. Thank you, John
-
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 9:58 am
- First Name: Gene
- Last Name: French
- Location: Nunn, CO
- Board Member Since: 2014
Re: connecting rod size
John:
if you start with the minus .010 rods (1.240" diameter ) you can scrape or bore to the 1.245" diameter needed … can make a smaller bore bigger but not so easy to make a too big bore smaller … always an optimist ...Gene French
if you start with the minus .010 rods (1.240" diameter ) you can scrape or bore to the 1.245" diameter needed … can make a smaller bore bigger but not so easy to make a too big bore smaller … always an optimist ...Gene French