1925 vs 1926-27 Rocky Mountain brakes

Discuss all things Model T related.
Forum rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules

Topic author
Reno Speedster
Posts: 573
Joined: Tue May 26, 2020 6:23 pm
First Name: Morgan
Last Name: Blanchard
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926 Model T Speedster Project, 1922 Runabout Pickup
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

1925 vs 1926-27 Rocky Mountain brakes

Post by Reno Speedster » Thu Feb 24, 2022 3:15 pm

I came into a set of new pre 1926 style Rocky Mountain brakes complete with the drums. I need a set for my 1926 speedster and I thought I could just run these without installing the drums. But, it appears the drums designed to go over the 1925 and earlier brake drum are bigger than the 1926-27 brake drums and they do not appear to close far enough to clamp on the 1926 drum. Can anyone confirm that this is true? If I were not in Alaska, I would sell these and order a 1926-27 set as they are cheaper than the pre-1926 set (since they don’t need the drums), but shipping would be a pain. I brought these up for free as checked luggage.

User avatar

DanTreace
Posts: 3813
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:56 am
First Name: Dan
Last Name: Treace
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: ‘12 open express,'23 cutoff, '27 touring
Location: North Central FL
Board Member Since: 2000
Contact:

Re: 1925 vs 1926-27 Rocky Mountain brakes

Post by DanTreace » Thu Feb 24, 2022 3:33 pm

You are correct.

Here is an earlier post on that subject.

viewtopic.php?t=17101
The best way is always the simplest. The attics of the world are cluttered up with complicated failures. Henry Ford
Don’t find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain. Henry Ford


Norman Kling
Posts: 4634
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 1:39 pm
First Name: Norman
Last Name: Kling
Location: Alpine California

Re: 1925 vs 1926-27 Rocky Mountain brakes

Post by Norman Kling » Thu Feb 24, 2022 5:02 pm

You might find someone else in Alaska who would like them, or find someone who is planning to visit your town who could deliver them to someone in the other 48 or to Canada. I have installed both kinds and the earlier ones with the bigger drums actually do stop a bit better than the 26-27. But both kinds work well if properly adjusted and run in the forward direction. Be sure to keep the transmission brake for the times you roll backward you can step harder to hold the car, or pull on the parking brake if not moving fast.
Norm


Dallas Landers
Posts: 2825
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 12:26 pm
First Name: Dallas
Last Name: Landers
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 26 Rpu, 23 TT, 24 coupe,
Location: N.E. Indiana

Re: 1925 vs 1926-27 Rocky Mountain brakes

Post by Dallas Landers » Thu Feb 24, 2022 5:22 pm

The 26- 27 drums are larger than earlier cars.
If I read it right yours is a small drum rear axle in a 26?


Topic author
Reno Speedster
Posts: 573
Joined: Tue May 26, 2020 6:23 pm
First Name: Morgan
Last Name: Blanchard
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926 Model T Speedster Project, 1922 Runabout Pickup
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

Re: 1925 vs 1926-27 Rocky Mountain brakes

Post by Reno Speedster » Thu Feb 24, 2022 5:41 pm

Dallas Landers wrote:
Thu Feb 24, 2022 5:22 pm
The 26- 27 drums are larger than earlier cars.
If I read it right yours is a small drum rear axle in a 26?
No, mine has the large 26-27 brake drums. It’s just that the conversion drums made for the pre-26 drums are even bigger. Now that I have the unit, it wouldn’t be all that hard to copy it. If I can find someone that needs these I might move them on.


speedytinc
Posts: 4727
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2021 12:24 pm
First Name: john
Last Name: karvaly
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 14/15 wide track roadster. 23 touring, 27 roadster pickup, 20ish rajo touring
Location: orange, ca
Board Member Since: 2020

Re: 1925 vs 1926-27 Rocky Mountain brakes

Post by speedytinc » Thu Feb 24, 2022 6:23 pm

I find 26-7 R/M brakes redundant & unnecessary. A well maintained emergency/park shoes stops better, (no reverse issues, stay dry, same surface less setup issues & not ugly) Just keep them grease free. The vendors even offer an equalizer/activator to work in concert with the brake pedal. I have a handy parking brake extension for extra braking needs. Using it has become automatic.

User avatar

JohnH
Posts: 367
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 6:57 pm
First Name: John
Last Name: Hunter
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926 Geelong Tourer
Location: Blue Mountains, Australia
Board Member Since: 2002
Contact:

Re: 1925 vs 1926-27 Rocky Mountain brakes

Post by JohnH » Thu Feb 24, 2022 7:32 pm

speedytinc wrote:
Thu Feb 24, 2022 6:23 pm
I find 26-7 R/M brakes redundant & unnecessary. A well maintained emergency/park shoes stops better, (no reverse issues, stay dry, same surface less setup issues & not ugly) Just keep them grease free. The vendors even offer an equalizer/activator to work in concert with the brake pedal. I have a handy parking brake extension for extra braking needs. Using it has become automatic.
My thoughts exactly. Totally unnecessary with a 26/27 rear end. And I don't even bother with the equaliser - using the handbrake is completely automatic, just like using the rest of the Model T's unique controls. I've even installed flip up oilers for the handbrake lever, instead of just the bare oiling holes in the chassis. And, before anyone says the transmission goes into neutral when using the rear brakes that way, I just step on the low pedal if I do need engine braking.


Topic author
Reno Speedster
Posts: 573
Joined: Tue May 26, 2020 6:23 pm
First Name: Morgan
Last Name: Blanchard
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926 Model T Speedster Project, 1922 Runabout Pickup
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

Re: 1925 vs 1926-27 Rocky Mountain brakes

Post by Reno Speedster » Thu Feb 24, 2022 8:09 pm

I have an auxiliary transmission on the speedster, so auxiliary brakes are a really good idea. If you are in neutral on the auxiliary transmission, the regular brake does not work and though the 26-27 parking brakes are better, I like the insurance of the auxiliary brake.

Plus, Chaffin’s sells the correct bands for the 26-27 for $150. It’s an easy switch.


Norman Kling
Posts: 4634
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 1:39 pm
First Name: Norman
Last Name: Kling
Location: Alpine California

Re: 1925 vs 1926-27 Rocky Mountain brakes

Post by Norman Kling » Fri Feb 25, 2022 5:01 pm

The problem with using the parking brake on a 26-27 is that it automatically puts the transmission in neutral. Better to leave in gear to get the additional braking of the engine compression. At lower speeds you can also use low gear. The low gear will work with the parking brake on, but not good to use with the car moving very fast. I like to have three braking systems. in this order: Rocky mountain first by using the pedal. Then the transmission brake by pushing the pedal further and lastly the parking brake which also applies the Rocky mountain brake.
Norm


Original Smith
Posts: 3699
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 10:43 am
First Name: Larry
Last Name: Smith
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 13 Touring, 13 Roadster, 17 Coupelet, 25 Roadster P/U
Location: Lomita, California
MTFCA Life Member: YES

Re: 1925 vs 1926-27 Rocky Mountain brakes

Post by Original Smith » Sat Feb 26, 2022 10:03 am

Real Rocky Mountain brakes are totally different, and have a larger drum than a 26-7.

User avatar

Craig Leach
Posts: 1906
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 12:22 am
First Name: craig
Last Name: leach
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1919 Firetruck/1922 Speedster
Location: Laveen Az

Re: 1925 vs 1926-27 Rocky Mountain brakes

Post by Craig Leach » Sat Feb 26, 2022 11:06 pm

Re: RM brakes?
Post by Craig Leach » Sat Feb 26, 2022 8:55 pm

This seems to come up alot. I have been told by the gentalman the makes RM's that the mounting casting is differant between the 9-25 & the 26-27 brakes. The wheel mounting not fitting also comes up. I have thrown this out there before can you have a 1 3/4" x 3/8 flat iron roled at the local fab shop, welded, heated, srunk on the 26-27 drum.Then turned to the same size as the 9-25 drum and solve both issues at the same time. This would also make a more robust drum for both the park brake & the RM. Or cut the center out of the 9-25 drums & weld them to the 26-27 drums. could be cheeper than a hole new set. Just a thought?
Craig.
Top


Topic author
Reno Speedster
Posts: 573
Joined: Tue May 26, 2020 6:23 pm
First Name: Morgan
Last Name: Blanchard
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926 Model T Speedster Project, 1922 Runabout Pickup
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

Re: 1925 vs 1926-27 Rocky Mountain brakes

Post by Reno Speedster » Sun Feb 27, 2022 12:14 am

Interestingly, I am not using the cast brackets. I built lowering brackets that double as the mounting brackets for the Rocky Mountain brake bands.

User avatar

Craig Leach
Posts: 1906
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 12:22 am
First Name: craig
Last Name: leach
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1919 Firetruck/1922 Speedster
Location: Laveen Az

Re: 1925 vs 1926-27 Rocky Mountain brakes

Post by Craig Leach » Sun Feb 27, 2022 3:00 pm

Morgan,
Looks like you know your way around fabricating. Why not shorten the bands to fit and sell the drums? I realy like your lowering brackets I'm looking at making something simular but on the back side and using the mount to locate a anchor for a set of 14" Studebaker brakes. Very simular to AC brakes in that they self energise both directions but are way larger.
Craig.


Topic author
Reno Speedster
Posts: 573
Joined: Tue May 26, 2020 6:23 pm
First Name: Morgan
Last Name: Blanchard
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926 Model T Speedster Project, 1922 Runabout Pickup
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

Re: 1925 vs 1926-27 Rocky Mountain brakes

Post by Reno Speedster » Sun Feb 27, 2022 5:39 pm

Craig,
I could do that. I have the tools (including a set of rollers) and was planning on making bands before I got these. But, changing the size of the existing bands would require pretty much taking the bands entirely apart. Since they are available, it’s probably easier to just buy them.

I got the idea for my lowering brackets from a design in the model t in speed and sport or the fast Ford handbook, which used a 1/2 plate to move the spring mount behind the axle. So, your idea should work. I just moved it to the front. Moving the springs to the front was not a new idea either, but I did not see anyone who did it with a plate like I did.

User avatar

Craig Leach
Posts: 1906
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 12:22 am
First Name: craig
Last Name: leach
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1919 Firetruck/1922 Speedster
Location: Laveen Az

Re: 1925 vs 1926-27 Rocky Mountain brakes

Post by Craig Leach » Sun Feb 27, 2022 9:14 pm

Hi Morgan,
These are not as nice as yours but I found them online and have seen a nicer set. I'm just thinking that new bands & lining would be just north of $400 and i'm pretty cheap. If I don't do the lions share of the work I can't afford all my toys.
lowering plate.jpg
Craig.


Topic author
Reno Speedster
Posts: 573
Joined: Tue May 26, 2020 6:23 pm
First Name: Morgan
Last Name: Blanchard
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926 Model T Speedster Project, 1922 Runabout Pickup
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

Re: 1925 vs 1926-27 Rocky Mountain brakes

Post by Reno Speedster » Sun Feb 27, 2022 11:05 pm

Those look good, pretty much exactly like the ones I saw plans for. I understand and agree about doing your own work. That’s how I am myself. I have too many interests to pay someone else to do the work. I also get really annoyed when I pay someone to do the job worse than I could do it myself. Plus, with every job I learn something.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic