BAD ROD ADVICE

Discuss all things Model T related.
Forum rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules

Topic author
Art Ebeling
Posts: 504
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:43 am
First Name: Art
Last Name: Ebeling
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1911 touring 14 runabout
Location: Hillsboro IL

BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by Art Ebeling » Sat Oct 04, 2025 5:12 pm

I looked at a 26 sedan today that a new owner had questions about a knocking noise. This car is a recent purchase of a "full restoration" that had a knocking engine after less than three miles of driving. The number two rod babbit is beat out and I am wondering about cleaning up the crankshaft rod journal. I checked the journal for size and it is standard. Does this rod journal look like it will clean up? I can't feel any scratches and I think what looks dull is babbit material that I will have to clean off. I will check the other rods and check the internal oil tube, maybe the mains. Any suggestions or other advice? Thanks, Art
Attachments
image4 (56).jpeg
image3 (76).jpeg
image2 - 2025-10-04T155408.019.jpeg
image1 - 2025-10-04T155403.884.jpeg
image0 - 2025-10-04T155359.505.jpeg


TrentB
Posts: 211
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:19 am
First Name: Trent
Last Name: Boggess
Location: New Hampshire

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by TrentB » Sat Oct 04, 2025 5:43 pm

I have seen something similar to this in an engine that had been run without oil.


TXGOAT2
Posts: 7819
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2021 10:08 pm
First Name: Pat
Last Name: McNallen
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926-7 roadster
Location: Graham, Texas
Board Member Since: 2021

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by TXGOAT2 » Sat Oct 04, 2025 6:00 pm

You can clean off the babbitt and polish the journal, then carefully check it for roundness, taper, and size. The replacement rod can be fitted for size, if the journal is an off-size, but the the journal must be round and straight. There are a number of reasons why the bearing could have failed.


Topic author
Art Ebeling
Posts: 504
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:43 am
First Name: Art
Last Name: Ebeling
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1911 touring 14 runabout
Location: Hillsboro IL

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by Art Ebeling » Sat Oct 04, 2025 6:05 pm

TXGOAT2 wrote:
Sat Oct 04, 2025 6:00 pm
You can clean off the babbitt and polish the journal, then carefully check it for roundness, taper, and size. The replacement rod can be fitted for size, if the journal is an off-size, but the the journal must be round and straight. There are a number of reasons why the bearing could have failed.
How would you clean and polish the journal? Thanks, Art


TXGOAT2
Posts: 7819
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2021 10:08 pm
First Name: Pat
Last Name: McNallen
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926-7 roadster
Location: Graham, Texas
Board Member Since: 2021

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by TXGOAT2 » Sat Oct 04, 2025 6:10 pm

"Crocus cloth" is often recommended for polishing crankshaft journals. Something like emery cloth with light oil would probably work OK. I'd use a pocket knife to gently scrape away the smeared babbitt. Scotchbrite might work to remove babbitt.


Daisy Mae
Posts: 382
Joined: Mon May 06, 2024 9:32 pm
First Name: Kurt
Last Name: Andersson
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1914 Touring
Location: Panama City Beach, FL

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by Daisy Mae » Sat Oct 04, 2025 6:19 pm

Sure looks like a run dry bearing to me, being a new rebuild maybe clearance set too tight ?
I'd certainly be pulling every cap to check/verify.
Call me anything you want...just so long as it isn't "late for dinner"


speedytinc
Posts: 4928
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2021 12:24 pm
First Name: john
Last Name: karvaly
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 14/15 wide track roadster. 23 touring, 27 roadster pickup, 20ish rajo touring
Location: orange, ca
Board Member Since: 2020

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by speedytinc » Sat Oct 04, 2025 6:33 pm

Art Ebeling wrote:
Sat Oct 04, 2025 6:05 pm
TXGOAT2 wrote:
Sat Oct 04, 2025 6:00 pm
You can clean off the babbitt and polish the journal, then carefully check it for roundness, taper, and size. The replacement rod can be fitted for size, if the journal is an off-size, but the the journal must be round and straight. There are a number of reasons why the bearing could have failed.
How would you clean and polish the journal? Thanks, Art
Long strip of fine emery cloth. Work like doing a shoe shine. Will polish about 1/3 @ a time. Rotate crank to several positions for an even polish.

More interesting is WHY did this happen? Normally oil loss takes out #1. Definitely check the inner oil funnel/tube.
You will need to check all the other rods for babbit condition & contact.

Restoration?? Who? Credentials? The corner gas station guy?
The answer to this would help decide whether or not to do a complete teardown. Was this a freak incident or the tip of the iceberg in a poor rebuild? Many more issues to follow? Never be able to trust the T waiting for the next mistake to make itself known.
Talk to the "restorer"

Tight piston? Tight wrist pin? Bent rod? I have yet to purchase a set of rods or remove a set from a motor that didnt have at least 1 bent enough to not need straightening in a set!! TRUST NO ONE.
Sorry to be such a bummer, but I have had to re-rebuild quite a few builds from incompetent T mechanics. Its all in the details.
Last edited by speedytinc on Sat Oct 04, 2025 6:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.


speedytinc
Posts: 4928
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2021 12:24 pm
First Name: john
Last Name: karvaly
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 14/15 wide track roadster. 23 touring, 27 roadster pickup, 20ish rajo touring
Location: orange, ca
Board Member Since: 2020

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by speedytinc » Sat Oct 04, 2025 6:34 pm

Daisy Mae wrote:
Sat Oct 04, 2025 6:19 pm
Sure looks like a run dry bearing to me, being a new rebuild maybe clearance set too tight ?
I'd certainly be pulling every cap to check/verify.
Then I would want to look @ the mains.


michaelb2296
Posts: 231
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2022 4:01 pm
First Name: Michael
Last Name: Bunner
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1912 Torpedo Roadster 1917 Smith Form-a-Truck
Location: Cary, NC
Board Member Since: 2007

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by michaelb2296 » Sat Oct 04, 2025 7:24 pm

Pictures #4 & #5 confuse me. Dirt, delamination, dirty piston where the wrist pin is. Doesnt add up.

But, maybe poor lighting? Idk. Im not there.

Question, with everything torqued down tight, could you easily hand crank through all 4 pistons (up/down) or was it too tight?

If no movement from the start, then delamination will occur.
I.e. pop/drag and go and hope for best is probably not the best solution.

If you can fix just the one thing and the other journals/rods look great then i would make sure the new #2 rod/piston/rings/journal rotate freely, fully torqued , without binding (<- a big deal) and try again.

We all learn through mistakes but as others have questioned maybe the rebuild was done by a good intentions person with little experience? It happens. Even if they are an EXPERT problems/mistakes can happen! Don’t ask me how i know…

Tight , is no good.


Adam
Posts: 1566
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:57 am
First Name: Adam
Last Name: Doleshal
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: ‘13 Touring, ‘24 Touring, ‘25 TT dump truck, ‘26 Tudor, ‘20 Theiman harvester T powerplant, ‘20 T Staude tractor
Location: Wisconsin
Board Member Since: 2000

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by Adam » Sat Oct 04, 2025 7:49 pm

It is a typical “burnt out bearing”. The babbitt instantly liquifies, slings out, and solidifies. It is usually from too tight clearance OR too little oil (or too much load on the engine). The inside oil line may be plugged or oil level too low. Maybe the babbitt quality is poor, but more than likely it was low oil, plugged oil line, or heavy loading (lugging the engine).


NoelChico
Posts: 279
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 10:42 pm
First Name: Noel
Last Name: Chicoine
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1920 roadster, 1923 Touring, 1926 Coupe
Location: Pierre, South Dakota
Board Member Since: 2005

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by NoelChico » Sat Oct 04, 2025 8:31 pm

I had a No. 2 rod that looked like that several years ago. A week before the Hamilton tour I tightened up some slightly loose rods, put it together, and had a rod knock at about 30 seconds of running. Maybe I forgot to put my usual "motor honey" on the rod cap on re-assembly. Maybe I adjusted it too tight. But I DID forget to put half a quart of oil in the filler, filling the dips on start-up. :roll:


Topic author
Art Ebeling
Posts: 504
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:43 am
First Name: Art
Last Name: Ebeling
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1911 touring 14 runabout
Location: Hillsboro IL

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by Art Ebeling » Sun Oct 05, 2025 8:58 am

Thanks for the answers. I don't know who restored this vehicle and I asked the owner if he thought he could get any help from the person he bought it from and he did not think he could. I will continue to disassemble and check everything. My main concern now is to try to determine the cause and clean up the crank. My personal opinion is that the restoration consisted of paint and gaskets.
Attachments
image0 - 2025-10-05T064954.870.jpeg


TXGOAT2
Posts: 7819
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2021 10:08 pm
First Name: Pat
Last Name: McNallen
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926-7 roadster
Location: Graham, Texas
Board Member Since: 2021

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by TXGOAT2 » Sun Oct 05, 2025 11:09 am

Do you know how much the engine has run since it was rebuilt, if it was rebuilt?
Another thought: Starting a new or rebuilt engine that has thick oil in the crank case in cold weather can result in oil starvation to bearings.


Adam
Posts: 1566
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:57 am
First Name: Adam
Last Name: Doleshal
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: ‘13 Touring, ‘24 Touring, ‘25 TT dump truck, ‘26 Tudor, ‘20 Theiman harvester T powerplant, ‘20 T Staude tractor
Location: Wisconsin
Board Member Since: 2000

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by Adam » Sun Oct 05, 2025 12:11 pm

Use of thick assembly lubes and the presence of grease inside the engine can also seal up the areas that provide oil and cause a bearing to run dry and fail. Grease and some assembly lubes do not mix readily with oil in engines that do not have a pressurized oil system.


big2bird
Posts: 581
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2020 10:57 pm
First Name: Jeffrey
Last Name: Hausey
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: Early 23 Touring
Location: Anaheim, Ca.
Board Member Since: 2020

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by big2bird » Sun Oct 05, 2025 4:42 pm

This one is a tough call. Fluke or more issues?
Tough hand to play.


Topic author
Art Ebeling
Posts: 504
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:43 am
First Name: Art
Last Name: Ebeling
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1911 touring 14 runabout
Location: Hillsboro IL

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by Art Ebeling » Mon Oct 06, 2025 11:30 am

I dug into this deeper this morning removing the other three rod caps. The babbit looks good but none of the rods have shims and there are file marks on the caps. I might plastigage them but I am leaning towards four new rods. I think someone has just filed them to fit. This “rebuilt” engine also has two piece valves. What are your opinions? Thanks Art


big2bird
Posts: 581
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2020 10:57 pm
First Name: Jeffrey
Last Name: Hausey
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: Early 23 Touring
Location: Anaheim, Ca.
Board Member Since: 2020

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by big2bird » Mon Oct 06, 2025 11:37 am

Nobody rebuilds an engine with 2 piece valves.

I would pull it with that tid bit.
Last edited by big2bird on Mon Oct 06, 2025 11:40 am, edited 1 time in total.


TXGOAT2
Posts: 7819
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2021 10:08 pm
First Name: Pat
Last Name: McNallen
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926-7 roadster
Location: Graham, Texas
Board Member Since: 2021

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by TXGOAT2 » Mon Oct 06, 2025 11:39 am

No shims and file marks indicate a worn engine with a shoddy "overhaul". In recent decades, any decent overhaul or valve service job would include replacing composite valves. Ford disowned the composite valves around 1926.


Topic author
Art Ebeling
Posts: 504
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:43 am
First Name: Art
Last Name: Ebeling
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1911 touring 14 runabout
Location: Hillsboro IL

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by Art Ebeling » Mon Oct 06, 2025 12:14 pm

I want to verify that these are two piece valves. They have the two holes on top. Art
Attachments
IMG_4612.jpeg


big2bird
Posts: 581
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2020 10:57 pm
First Name: Jeffrey
Last Name: Hausey
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: Early 23 Touring
Location: Anaheim, Ca.
Board Member Since: 2020

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by big2bird » Mon Oct 06, 2025 12:34 pm

Yes........


speedytinc
Posts: 4928
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2021 12:24 pm
First Name: john
Last Name: karvaly
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 14/15 wide track roadster. 23 touring, 27 roadster pickup, 20ish rajo touring
Location: orange, ca
Board Member Since: 2020

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by speedytinc » Mon Oct 06, 2025 12:35 pm

Verified....

User avatar

RajoRacer
Posts: 5313
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 12:18 pm
First Name: Steve
Last Name: Tomaso
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1914 Touring, 1919 Centerdoor, 1924 TT C-Cab Express, 1925 Racer
Location: Longbranch, WA
Board Member Since: 2001

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by RajoRacer » Mon Oct 06, 2025 1:01 pm

And, this is what can happen !!!
Attachments
2 piece valve.JPG

User avatar

Mark Gregush
Posts: 5425
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2019 1:57 pm
First Name: Mark
Last Name: Gregush
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1925 cutdown PU, 1948 F2 Ford flat head 6 pickup 3 speed
Location: Portland Or
Board Member Since: 1999

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by Mark Gregush » Mon Oct 06, 2025 1:08 pm

What I would call an Ice Cream restoration, looks pretty on the outside to go get Ice Cream or local 4th of July parade with the grandkids, but underneath nada was done to the car. :(
I know the voices aren't real but damn they have some good ideas! :shock:

1925 Cut down pickup
1948 Ford F2 pickup


John kuehn
Posts: 4508
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:00 pm
First Name: John
Last Name: Kuehn
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 19 Roadster, 21 Touring, 24 Coupe
Location: Texas

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by John kuehn » Mon Oct 06, 2025 1:10 pm

I think this rebuilt T got a nice repaint and body cleanup looking at the pictures.

The engine was “freshened up” and not necessarily rebuilt sometime in the past and that’s about it.

Looks like it has the original valves and the rods filed for a better fit up. But if it’s got the older 2 piece valves I don’t think the engine was renewed or rebuilt.


Topic author
Art Ebeling
Posts: 504
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:43 am
First Name: Art
Last Name: Ebeling
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1911 touring 14 runabout
Location: Hillsboro IL

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by Art Ebeling » Mon Oct 06, 2025 1:51 pm

Would you use X’d rods or non X’d rods? Art


TXGOAT2
Posts: 7819
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2021 10:08 pm
First Name: Pat
Last Name: McNallen
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926-7 roadster
Location: Graham, Texas
Board Member Since: 2021

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by TXGOAT2 » Mon Oct 06, 2025 2:42 pm

As far as I know, Ford didn't use X'd rods. They did describe the correct way to finish new babbitt.


big2bird
Posts: 581
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2020 10:57 pm
First Name: Jeffrey
Last Name: Hausey
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: Early 23 Touring
Location: Anaheim, Ca.
Board Member Since: 2020

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by big2bird » Mon Oct 06, 2025 2:52 pm

Art Ebeling wrote:
Mon Oct 06, 2025 1:51 pm
Would you use X’d rods or non X’d rods? Art
I would use X rods with scoops.


J and M Machine
Posts: 125
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2019 6:46 pm
First Name: John
Last Name: Gulbankian
Location: Massachusetts
Contact:

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by J and M Machine » Tue Oct 07, 2025 8:43 am

With the amount of dirty oil discoloration in the engine I doubt it came apart for a thorough rebuild.
The connecting rod wasn't tinned as babbitt needs tin to fuse to as babbitt doesn't stick to steel.

I would recommend you go through the engine methodically as i doubt anything has been done to it other than a spray can paint job to the block.
We always see this type of rebuild when they spend all the money on the body but "Don't Open the Hood"!


John kuehn
Posts: 4508
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:00 pm
First Name: John
Last Name: Kuehn
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 19 Roadster, 21 Touring, 24 Coupe
Location: Texas

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by John kuehn » Tue Oct 07, 2025 10:36 am

This T was sold to the person that Art E. knows took the advice that it was restored by the seller. Since the body looks it was at least being close to ‘restored’ what about the differential and front end?
The engine will probably have to be pulled and checked out along with the transmission.
In the long run that’s the best option.
Maybe the seller/rebuilder sold the car thinking that the mechanical part was OK but it really makes you wonder. I don’t have a machine shop or rebuilt scores of T engines but only 4 but when I noticed the 2 piece valves that was a dead giveaway the seller didn’t know much about T engines.


Topic author
Art Ebeling
Posts: 504
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:43 am
First Name: Art
Last Name: Ebeling
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1911 touring 14 runabout
Location: Hillsboro IL

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by Art Ebeling » Tue Oct 07, 2025 11:41 am

I have been using the word "rebuilt", the owner clarified that and told me he was not told it was rebuilt but restored and gone thru. All in all it looks like a nice car. Art


speedytinc
Posts: 4928
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2021 12:24 pm
First Name: john
Last Name: karvaly
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 14/15 wide track roadster. 23 touring, 27 roadster pickup, 20ish rajo touring
Location: orange, ca
Board Member Since: 2020

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by speedytinc » Tue Oct 07, 2025 11:43 am

Art Ebeling wrote:
Tue Oct 07, 2025 11:41 am
I have been using the word "rebuilt", the owner clarified that and told me he was not told it was rebuilt but restored and gone thru. All in all it looks like a nice car. Art
......... with another $6,000 in mechanical work.

This situation is all too common.
But, that's the way I like to buy a personal car.
Ill do the mechanics & be able to rely on the machine for a lifetime + of service.


TXGOAT2
Posts: 7819
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2021 10:08 pm
First Name: Pat
Last Name: McNallen
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1926-7 roadster
Location: Graham, Texas
Board Member Since: 2021

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by TXGOAT2 » Tue Oct 07, 2025 12:25 pm

After a proper rebuild, the new owner will no doubt have more $ in the car than "market". However it will be a reliable car with a long mechanical life expectancy that could be expected, with reasonable care, to provide many, many miles of reliable service with minimal further expense.


speedytinc
Posts: 4928
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2021 12:24 pm
First Name: john
Last Name: karvaly
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 14/15 wide track roadster. 23 touring, 27 roadster pickup, 20ish rajo touring
Location: orange, ca
Board Member Since: 2020

Re: BAD ROD ADVICE

Post by speedytinc » Tue Oct 07, 2025 2:38 pm

My advice, which I have shared with several would be buyers, assume a complete engine overhaul, absent of conclusive proof otherwise, pay accordingly. That prices the prettiest T's in the $6-8K range. Add the extra $6K for the rebuild. You are in for $12k. You still may not be able to recoup all your investment in $, but you will be ahead factoring in the fun & experience of ownership.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic