Spindle bolt diameter Vs. spindle bushing reamer diameter.

Discuss all things Model T related.
Forum rules
If you need help logging in, or have question about how something works, use the Support forum located here Support Forum
Complete set of Forum Rules Forum Rules
User avatar

Topic author
Pep C Strebeck
Posts: 578
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:12 am
First Name: Joseph
Last Name: M
Location: MI

Spindle bolt diameter Vs. spindle bushing reamer diameter.

Post by Pep C Strebeck » Sun Jan 05, 2020 5:02 pm

While feeling a bit under-the-weather today (or Wonky-Donkey, as my son always says) I have been cleaning out a tool cabinet that has raised a few questions. This is all in regards to spindle bolts and spindle bolt reamers, in particular bolt diameters and reamer diameters. Here is a link to the Forum from 2017 where this was discussed somewhat:

http://www.mtfca.com/discus/messages/70 ... 1493409015

As for what is available from 2 vendors, that is listed below:

Langs sells 3 sets:
2710SB 1917-1927 0.500” diameter
2710SA 1909-1916 0.500” diameter
2710SAOR 1909-1914 0.502” diameter “These spindle bolts have been made from the original Ford prints
2317RM Reamer 0.500” diameter, yet here on their webpage they say the spindle bolt is 0.4995” in diameter :?:

Snyders sells 2 sets:
T-2710-AS 1909-1916 No mention of bolt diameter, I would guess it is the same as the later set
T-2710-BS 1917-1927 0.500” bolt diameter, ream bushings to 0.504”
T-2713-R 1909-1927 Reamer, 0.504” diameter

So Langs sells 2 different diameter spindle bolts and one reamer (that is too small for their original style bolts) and Snyders sells 2 different sets (year/oiler) with one diameter and a reamer that is 0.004” oversize.

After reading through the previously mentioned Forum thread, looking at the vendors websites and the tooling that I have on hand, I must admit that I am a bit confused. According to Mr. Anderson in the previous Forum discussion, from late 1909 until January of 1920 the spindle bolt diameter was 0.502” – 0.504” (+/- 0.002”). And after January 1920, the dimension changed to 0.500” – 0.504” (+/- 0.004”). The Ford Service Manual in paragraph 687 (page 167) states that the newly installed spindle bushings should be “line reamed to .504"/.504"” If indeed the bolt dimension was now 0.500" instead of the earlier 0.502" they are telling the mechanics to still ream them for the larger diameter bolts.

As for the reamers, I have 2 reamers (both bought from Snyders) one labeled 0.500” (measures out at 0.501” and bought some 10 years ago) and a newer production reamer labeled as 0.504” (it measures 0.504”). The reamers that are sold by Langs are labeled as being 0.500” but I do not have one on hand to check. I also have 2 original combination spindle/tie rod bolt reamers (one by Western Auto and the other by Reiff & Nestor) and both of these reamers measure 0.504” for the spindle bolt and 0.565” for the tie rod bolt. The Snyders reamer at 0.504” and the original Western Auto and Reiff & Nestor reamers would work for Langs original style spindle bolts, 2710SAOR with their larger diameter.

In the earlier 2017 Forum thread, Mr. Dewey brings up a very good point and question: “OK, maybe I'm wrong here, but if the original spec is for .503, I would think a . 500 or .499 bolt would be sloppy in the upper AXLE hole, and the threads loose in the lower threaded AXLE hole. Maybe this is why so many axles nowadays are worn, both top and bottom”.

So, I guess my questions are these:

Were there 2 different diameter spindle bolts during production?

In connection to the above question, did Ford Change the bolt dimension but not the clearance dimension?

Was there originally only one size/dimension reamer (0.504” vs 0.500”)?

Is the 0.500” reamer that is being sold/made today just “modern” to reduce the loose/sloppy fit of the original Ford 0.504” specification (0.004” is not huge but seems excessive)?

In reference to Mr. Deweys question from the earlier thread about worn axles, a more loose/sloppy fit between the spindle bolt and spindle bushings would create an added stress and wear on the axle: Is the problem of worn spindle bolt holes in the axle more common/prevalent on axles/cars made after January 1920 versus the earlier pre-1920 cars/axles?

Now I will quietly go back to cleaning out the tool cabinet.
"Remember son, there are two ways to do this: The right way, and your way” Thanks Dad, I love you too.

LOOKING FOR A LUFKIN No. 9A Height Gage Attachment.


Scott_Conger
Posts: 6524
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:18 am
First Name: Scott
Last Name: Conger
* REQUIRED* Type and Year of Model Ts owned: 1919
Location: not near anywhere, WY
Board Member Since: 2005

Re: Spindle bolt diameter Vs. spindle bushing reamer diameter.

Post by Scott_Conger » Sun Jan 05, 2020 5:54 pm

Lang's is a reamer for 95+% of all spindle bolts...namely the standard lower cost bolts (.500) that fit for 09-27, but are "correct" only for later cars, about '18 and newer

Snyders is a reamer for RV Anderson's correct 09-14 bolts (.502 bolts)

Long before the Snyder's reamer was available, I reamed early cars with a piloted line reamer (.500) from Langs and followed up with a .503 reamer using a tapered pilot on the shank. That resulted in a very good close fit for the early spindle bolts.

Just reading the Snyder's ad and not knowing the difference will lead to a very loosely fitting spindle. Too bad it's not made more clear.
Scott Conger

Tyranny under the guise of law is still Tyranny

NH Full Flow Float Valves™
Obsolete carburetor parts manufactured


Dan Hatch
Posts: 5032
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 7:31 pm
First Name: Dan
Last Name: Hatch
Location: Alabama

Re: Spindle bolt diameter Vs. spindle bushing reamer diameter.

Post by Dan Hatch » Sun Jan 05, 2020 7:06 pm

Hone them with Sunnen hone and you will never use a reamer again. Dan

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic